Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Akin: "I misspoke". (A commentary from The Onion News Network) :)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-12 11:48 PM
Original message
Akin: "I misspoke". (A commentary from The Onion News Network) :)
What I Meant To Say Is 'I Am Dumb As Dog Shit And I Am A Terrible Human Being'



As a politician, I often find myself in situations where, unfortunately, I express a certain thought or idea poorly, or find my words taken out of context. Indeed, that is what happened this weekend. Upon reviewing the impromptu remarks I made Sunday afternoon, I can now see that I used the wrong words in the wrong way. I would now like to set the record straight with the American people and clear up some confusion about what it was I intended to convey.

You see, what I said was, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” But what I meant to say was, “I am a worthless, moronic sack of shit and an utterly irredeemable human being who needs to shut up and go away forever.”

It is clear to me now that I did not choose my words with care and did not get across the point I was trying to convey. In hindsight, I guess instead of using the words “legitimate rape,” I should have used the words “I am an unforgivable, unrepentant, and unconscionable subhuman dickhead.” Or better yet, “I am an evil, fucked-up man who should never have been elected to the United States Congress, and anyone who would vote for me is probably a pretty big fucking dumbshit, too.” See how much more sense that makes? It’s amazing how a few key word changes can totally alter the meaning of a statement.

Because, of course, it’s all about context. And yes, when you take what I said out of context, I can see how it might sound like I’m denying that women can be impregnated via rape. This is, I assure you, not what I was trying to express at all. Such is the age we live in that one little sentence excerpted in a news report can come back to haunt a person in a pretty big hurry. But if you actually go back and look at the remarks closely, you’ll see that what I was actually trying to convey in my statement was that

(1) I am a big fucking idiot,
(2) I am a nauseating slug of a human being who doesn’t deserve to live, and
(3) I am essentially everything that’s wrong with this country and with humanity in general.

The rest: http://www.theonion.com/articles/i-misspokewhat-i-meant-to-say-is-i-am-dumb-as-dog,29256/


Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-12 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. The GOP pulled his funding. Chuck Todd said that, by law, today is his last day to pull out of the
Senate race and, I guess, his Congressional seat is up for grabs.

Lawrence O'Donnell said that the idea that a woman who has been raped cannot become pregnant dates back to the 13th Century. However, very early in the thirteenth century, King John--one of the bad guys in the Robin Hood legend-- signed the Magna Carta. So, I am assuming that were more advanced then politically than we are today. Medically, not so much.

I used to think that I knew what the word "rape" meant. Now, I see I was mistaking about that. I would like to know which rapes are "legitimate" and which are NOT forcible.






Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-12 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Medieval would fit
That's the direction republikkaners want to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec 25th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC