|
Edited on Tue Sep-11-12 09:08 AM by No Elephants
successful business person. That would be someone who enjoys life, is responsible and giving to his or her loved ones and friends, wants to do no damage and makes some contribution to the larger community.(I have not really thought much about the definition: this is just what came to the mind immediately.)
As for Romney, I think return on investment overrode wanting to do no damage.
I am also going to add something. I honestly don't feel comfortable going to religion because that should be personal. However, since the right makes so much about religion, I will go there.
I did not watch the Republican convention, but I take it that a lot of the personal testimonials came from fellow Mormons. Well, Romney was a bishop of his church. As such, it is part of the job description to visit members of the church when they are in crisis. Therefore, I don't think his presence in hospital rooms was necessarily evidence of a tender heart in general. He may be tender hearted, or he may be obedient to the church, and/or he may want power within the church. We don't know.
If you have never been a member of a cult that feels oppressed by the outside world, you may not understand the mentality. You pull closer to the members of particular religious community, but as far as "the world," anything goes, as long as you see it as futhering your own religious community.
And I do mean anything, including things expressly prohibited by the religion itself, like lying, and also including things that are illegal under secular law. There is one standard for your conduct with fellow church/cult/sect members and an entirely different standard--or no standard--for your dealings with outsiders.
As to government in particular, there is a weird combination of jingoism and nationalism plus mistrust and an adversarial mentality. I have seen it up close and personal, though I was in denial. (Not Mormons, but Mormons have a special adversarial relationship with government that other religions did not have.)
Mormons perceived themselves as persecuted by government, particularly as to state bigamy laws.
The very first religious freedom case in the U.S. Supreme Court was about whether a state could use its bigamy laws against Mormons when their religion required multiple marriage. (Jon Huntsman was on Daily Show. He and Willard share a great grandad, who had twelve wives.)
The SCOTUS held that the bigamy laws could be enforced, despite the core religious belief. And that relationship between church and government had a profound effect on Mormons that lingers until the present.
When the church itself changed its policy on multiple marriage (at least officially), the very hard core multiple marriage folk went rogue from even the church. Romney's ancestor in particular gave up both church and country (though not citizenship).
They saw themselves as estranged from the mother church, form their native country, where their families had been for generations (Romney's family since colonial days), and also from the Mexicans among whom they lived in their adopted land, but did not intermingle. That is hard core.
Willard's own father was born in Mexico and lived his early years there, so the mentality is not all that all that far from Willard's upbringing and psyche.
Even after the change in marriage policy, though, the Mormons in the U.S. saw it as being in their own self interest to be secretive, to mistrust government, etc. This seems to be a one sided thing, since they prefer no contact by government with Mormons, but seem to feel free, indeed desirous, to intrude into government.
So, you do not allow government to use your premises as a polling place, for examplem(for one thing, lord only knows what might be observed that you would rather keep secret); and you disclose as little as possible to government (or the general public, for that matter). On the other hand, you move heaven and earth to oppose Prop 8 like a juggernaut and seek public office?
That is a very bizarre relationship with government and your fellow citizens, in my opinion. (Am I the only one who finds it odd that Mormons are such a relatively small minority in the U.S., yet had three people running for President in 2012, Huntsman, Romney and Anderson?--though Anderson, like Rubio, claims to be an ex-Mormon.)
When secrecy is very much part of the culture, it's hard for outsiders to assess accurately. However, look at how many times the Mother Church in Utah has promised to stop proxy baptisim of Jews and, every time, continuing baptisms have been discovered later. Clearly, lying to outsiders is not a big problem. Neither are the deep religious wishes of outsiders. So, that tells me that it is similar to the mentality I observed up close and personal.
I am sorry if this sounds like religious bigotry, but unrepentant. I do not trust the "outcast minority religion oppressed by the public in general and government in particular" mentality, especially in public office, not if it's Mormon and not if it's any other sect.
|