|
Edited on Wed Sep-12-12 10:02 AM by No Elephants
On the evening of 9/11, Willard's campaign emailed a press release to media, condemning the actions of {allegedly} President Obama. (As it turned out, it was someone in the Egyptian embassy.)
The press release bore the instruction, "Do not release this until 12:05 a.m. (meaning, 9/11 would have ended.) Then, at 12:05 came a second email from the Romney campaign saying, okay, you can release it now.
This was supposed to be respectful of 9/11? Wowza! Not to mention that he did not even hold back long enough to know the facts.
Then, this morning, Hillary, as Secretary of State, spoke of the death of the ambassador, Obama having deferred to her, which was gracious and appropriate. Obama was scheduled to speak shortly afterward. And, in the interim between the comments of Hillary and the comments of the President, Mitt dares to hold a press conferencem on this.
When the press asked him if he had not been disrespectful, condemning the remarks that had come out of Egypt, Romney said that the President had done something similar, "distancing himself" from the remarks. Talk about a false equivalency. The President is conducting foreign policy as his people in the Middle East are under attack and perhaps making unauthorized statements, while MIttens is only campaigning.
Asked what the President had done wrong, Mitt said it was his administration, and he was responsible, even though the remarks were unauthorized. Yes, true, which was exactly why the President HAD to speak out and Mitt had no business speaking out.
And what was Mitt's big beef with the unauthorized remarks anyway? Well, the guy in Egypt, whose embassy was a target, had the temerity to say that the film should have been more respectful of the Muslim religion.
According to Mitt, this is terrible because America believes in free speech. True, but it also believes in things like the free exercise of religion and mutual respect. Oh, and btw, the guy in the Cairo embassy has the right of free speech too. And did I mention his embassy was at risk at the time?
Romney is an opportunistic POS. Oh, and our friends at MSNBC daytime had next to no criticism of Romney, but rather kept repeating what he had said.
Here we have a volatile situation, with one ambassador dead and others still at risk; and this turd takes the "opportunity" of this tragedy to show his support for an Israeli film maker who called Islam a cancer? And then excuses that by saying he is defending freedom of speech?
Willard, please!
|