Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Day exit polls axed in 19 states (Rut roh.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-12 05:35 AM
Original message
Election Day exit polls axed in 19 states (Rut roh.)
Exit polls tend to cast suspicion on certain election "wins," assuming most voters are truthful about the vote they just cast.

They are one more barrier to stolen elections. Remember, as of a couple of days ago, Republicans were writing off Romney and focusing on down ticket races, so how solid these states allegedly are for either Obama or Romney is beside the point.




U.S. News
Election Day exit polls axed in 19 states

Published: Oct. 5, 2012 at 4:00 AM

NEW YORK, Oct. 5 (UPI) -- U.S. TV networks won't conduct Election Day exit polls in 19 states deemed non-competitive this year, the National Election Pool said, citing rising costs.


The omitted states are Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming, as well as the District of Columbia.

Some precincts from these states will be included in a separate national exit survey -- the number of precincts sampled nationally has been increased to 350 from 300 in 2008 -- but information about voter age, race, sex, religious preference and other pertinent data in those 19 states will not be available, Merkle said.

The budget for the exit polls is about the same as four years ago, he said, but would have had to be significantly increased to provide the same coverage as in 2008.


That last clause is an inexplicable statement, isn't it? They have the necessary equipment and Lord knows, wages have not risen in real dollars since the late 1970s. So, is the issue gasoline, electricity, or what? What could be so expensive and important?



But the excluded states include a "toss-up" U.S. Senate race in North Dakota between Democratic former state Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp and Republican Rep. Rick Berg.

Two other omitted states include contests in the "leaning" Democratic category in the U.S. Senate race in Hawaii and the governor's race in West Virginia.

With Texas excluded, the nation's second-most populous state will not have a statewide exit poll. Nor will No. 9 Georgia.

This is the first time the pool has cut the number of states it surveys in a presidential election year.




Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/10/05/Election-Day-exit-polls-axed-in-19-states/UPI-69721349424000/#ixzz28Q2i9d8V


I do not like this one little bit, but what can you do? The people own their airwaves only in theory--and it's a pretty transparent theory at that.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-12 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exit polls in 2004 Ohio
proved that there was illegal vote tampering. PROVED. There is no possible explanation for exit polls being that incorrect. I think it is clear that the GOP plans to cheat in this election like never before.

My question is why is the DOJ standing there without trying to prevent this. It's just more odd behavior by this DOJ and the Obama Administration. Sure the Bush DOJ broke all the records for malfeasance but the Obama DOJ breaks all the records for making me suspicious. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-12 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed. I never got the 2004 story.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2340537

How did Carville find out so quickly that Kerry intended to contest?

Why did he call his wife to tell her (while she was in Cheney's office)?

Why did Kerry change his mind about contesting? Did Cheney have something on him or a family member?

Why did anyone in the Democratic Party ever speak to Carville again, let alone continue to pretend he was a spokesperson or surrogate for the Democratic Party?

So many questions, so little time, so few who care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-12 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Carville lost all credibility with me some time ago.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC