Or not.
Yesterday was Columbus Day, a day we celebrate theoretically because Columbus discovered "America" in 1492, sailing for Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain.
Columbus was supposed to have been an incredible navigator. However, he never set foot in North America, let alone discovering any of the the lands that now comprise the United States. And he never thought that he had discovered anything other than a shorter route to India. which is what you call a huge mistake, perhaps even wilful ignorance.
It was Amerigo Vespucci, sailing variously for Spain and Portugal, who realized that there were huge land masses here that were not on European maps and this was not India at all. I am not sure if even he set foot in America, either.
According to the human genome project, sll humans now on this planet are descended from Kalahari Bushmen. They and their descendants spread out from Southern Africa to various countries, adapting surprisingly quickly, sd evolution goes, to things like to sun and lack of sun as they traveled and inhabited the Middle East, Australia, etc.
As to when they first arrived in the Americas, information conflicts. Sources I have looked at quickly say thinks like around 12,000 yeares ago and maybe as much as 50,000 years ago.
Some say all the original settlers of what is now North America arrived via the Bering Strait. However, others say they came from several places, like Japan and Phoencia.
http://www.atlantisquest.com/America.htmlhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041118104010.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clovis_culture+http://courses.csusm.edu/hist337as/hb/h37hb1.htmI do not know enough to resolve the conflicting information. However, one thing is very clear: Columbus did not discover any theretofore undiscovered land. Neither did the Vikings.
As for my day of discovery: I have known for years that that Columbus and his men had been brutal. However, I did not know until yesterday that they had actually penned the people they found living here.
I also learned for the first time yesterday that mass suicides occurred when the people who had been here for thousands of years before Columbus "discovered" a new route to India understood that the Europeans were never going to leave for good.
In all, I have no idea why we celebrate Columbus Day.
True, Italians were a large immigrant group, and honoring their countryman was probably politicially expedient. However, Amerigo Vespucci was Italian, too, and not as stubborn as Columbus about a route to India; and the nation had, after all, been named after Vespucci. So, why we have not been celebrating Vespucci Day instead of Columbus Day is beyond me, even if we assume that we have to have an Italian holiday.
Because people are finally owning up fully to the reality that Columbus neither discovered America nor was a nice guy, there is now talk of re-styling Columbus Day and instead celebrating it as Explorers' Day which, would, I assume, include space exploration.
The other explorers have been dead for a long time, and no one knows who their descendants are. So wouldn't "Explorers' Day pretty much turn out to be a celebration space explorers? That would fine, I guess, but...
Why don't we include the true discoverers of the huge land masses that we now refer to as the Americas, the ones who arrived here somewhere btween 12,000 and 50,000 years ago, all the tribes that we once called Indian tribes, in "tribute" to Columbus's massive error?
I vote for Discovers' Day, which would be broad enough to include anyone who makes a significant discovery. That would honor the first inhabitants of this land, guys like the Vikings and Columbus and Vespucci and Magellan, and maybe even some great inventors.