But first, a factoid.
A fantastic re-enactor plays Paul Revere at the Revere House. It does not seem to be just a job for him. He seems entirely "into it."
Speaking as Paul Revere, he "explained" "I would never have said, "The British are coming."
He went on to point out that, in Massachusetts, just before the Revolution began, "We were all British. I considered myself British."
IIRC, after that, he said that, while his recollection of his exact words that night is no longer perfect, he
may have said something like, "The Redcoats are coming."
In fairness to Paul, it was a high tension situation that night. Tough to remember.
Now, "Paul" is speculating, I assume, since no one recorded what Revere said that night and his own memory of his exact words has faded. (Gee, youdda thunk someone would have whipped out the a camcorder, wouldn't ya No sense of history, those people in 1775!)
But, the re-enactor has done a lot of research on every little detail and given everything a lot of thought. What he said made sense to me.
Now the secret, just between you and me (and anyone who accesses wikipedia):
The Ride
On the evening of April 18, 1775, Paul Revere and William Dawes were dispatched by Joseph Warren to warn the countryside that the British were coming. Prescott was in Lexington at the time to visit with his fiancee Lydia Mulliken.<6> He was also there to report on Concord’s readiness, its status in hiding supplies and munitions from the British, and its success in moving cannon to Groton lest it fall into British hands.<7> The British wanted the military stores at Concord and had hoped to capture Samuel Adams and John Hancock in the process.
<snip>
Dawes also escaped from his pursuers, but it was after a close chase, a frantic ruse on his part, and a little bit of luck. Once he was safe, he considered circling around the patrol and racing on to Concord much as Prescott had, but he heard the Concord town house bell and knew Prescott had made it there, and so he continued on his special mission, for he was only assigned to accompany Revere to Concord.<9> Prescott, meanwhile, continued west to warn Acton, Massachusetts while his brother Abel Prescott rode south to warn Sudbury and Framingham. By this time, countless riders were also dispatched from other towns to spread the warning—while bells and cannon were rung or fired to punctuate the danger at hand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_PrescottRemember, at the point that Sarah made her comments, she was touring America in her bus. She spoke after just having taken a tour of Revere's house and also of Lexington and Concord, where there is also a re-enactment, and probably other historic sites in Massachusetts. The info she learned was fresh in her mind.
Maybe she did not say what she said in a very artful or scholarly way, but she was not far off base on the facts, either (aside from the facts that no one knows what any of the players actually yelled out that night).
Would I have pointed this out online while Palin was looking as though she might run for something after she finished her bus tour? Hmmm. I don't recall ever having posted this stuff before today. Maybe the subject never came up at DU at the time that she made those remarks?
;-)
P.S. What if the "Redcoat NSA" had access to Revere's metadata?
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-06-12/what-if-the-redcoat-nsa-had-access-to-paul-reveres-metadataBTW, Joseph Warren was a doctor (very nasty business back then) and I have seen his reenactor at the Revere House as well. Massachusetts General Hospital has a Warren Building. I don't know if his descendants had anything to do with funding it, or if the hospital just named the building after this historic surgeon.
While practicing medicine and surgery in Boston, he joined the Masonic Lodge of St. Andrew and eventually was appointed as a Grand Master.<[2> He also became involved in politics, associating with John Hancock, Samuel Adams, and other radical leaders of the broad movement labeled Sons of Liberty. Warren conducted an autopsy on the body of young Christopher Seider in February 1770, and was a member of the Boston committee that assembled a report on the following month's Boston Massacre. Earlier, in 1768, Royal officials tried to place his publishers Edes and Gill on trial for an incendiary newspaper essay Warren wrote under the pseudonym A True Patriot, but no local jury would indict them.<3>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_WarrenThe above quote from his wiki is food for thought about what the Framers thought of anti-government radicals and also what their idea of a jury system and jury nullification would have been.
The whole idea of a jury of one's peers in England was that jurors, being in the neighborhood and knowing the suspect personally--and maybe having heard gossip--were in the best position to decide guilt or innocence. The Framers would never have understood today's jury instruction and sequestion. But, don't hold your breath waiting for the great originalist on the SCOTUS to strike down any of those modern precedents relating to juries. He's very selective about which "intent of the Framers" he upholds and which he strikes down.
The bit about Masons is interesting, too.