Now that he is in his 80s, he finally got convicted and arrested.
Sure, he finally got two life sentences. But, he is in his 80s. What does that mean? I feel the frustration that I feel when a couple of pedophile priests out of many finally get arrested when they're in their 70s or 80s. Better than nothing at all, but jeez!
There were several reports of his whereabouts. According to my California buddy, there is a bar in California where Boston expats, like him and Whitey, gather together to watch games with like-minded fans. Whitey's presence at that bar had been reported several times over the years, including one time during a live radio broadcast.
The radio show was a Boston show about sports where listeners are invited to call in. My friend was in Boston listening to that show when someone called from that very bar, saying "He's here. I am looking at him right now, I swear to God." (Why this bozo calls a sports show in Boston instead of 911 to get the Santa Monica police is another story. Maybe he had too much to drink to think straight?)
The FBI claims it followed every lead, but geez. You'd think, wouldn't you, that, after several of those reports about the bar in Santa Monica, at least one agent would have been issued a Red Sox cap and shirt and assigned to sit in that bar during every game played by a Boston team for a year?
http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/june/bulger_062311 Over the years, there were also stories of Bulger having been spotted in Italy, in Ireland, etc. Meanwhile, he was in Santa Monica all along. I wish I knew if the "Whitey spotted abroad" stories were generated by the FBI itself? If he's being spotted all over the globe, it's easy to roll eyes and groan when someone says he's in a sports bar in Santa Monica, watching the Red Sox (or the Pats or the Bruins or the Celts).
I'd love a chronology of the sightings, to see how the reports of his being in Santa Monica correlate in any way with reports of his having been sighted elsewhere. I wonder if I'd see a pattern of a report of a sighting in Santa Monica followed shortly by a report of sighting in New York, or Ireland or Gibraltar.
I just looked at the current FBI ten most wanted list. They are some rough guys on that list (no women currently), but most of them committed one horrible crime, being it murder or robbery, not scores of both, as in Whitey's case.
The FBI sure had protected him for a long time. He was in crime all his life and didn't even make it to the Most Wanted List until the mid 80s. Then he stayed on it for 16 years before he was arrested. Even after the arrest, the survivors of the murder victims were not at all happy with the FBI. Many feel their loved one would have been alive if the FBI had not protected Whitey for so long. The judge in Whitey's trial was not too happy with the FBI, either. And I bet we don't know the half of it.
Maybe the FBI did not want all that raked over in a federal courthouse in Boston?
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/24/defense-says-they-need-talk-with-press-defend-whitey-bulger-both-inside-and-outside-courthouse/C1PzGo4PoL2vdHFOLkiOWO/story.htmlAt the time of his arrest, it seemed to me like a pretty big coincidence. Whitey had been Number 1 on the list from the 1980s until Bin Laden replaced him as Number 1, whereupon Whitey slid to Number 2. Ben Laden had been on the list from 2001 or thereabouts. And bing, Osama gets his May 2, 2011 and Whitey is arrested June 22, 2011, not two months later. I don't know what to make of that, if anything.
Do one spectacular thing that most people in the Western world will think is great, like getting Bin Laden. Then, while the government is basking in the afterglow of that, drag in Whitey, Number 2 on the list and figure the news of the FBI's complicity will not seem like such a big deal? Or, it could have been a sheer coincidence, albeit a huge coincidence. We'll probably never know for certain.