|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 03:21 PM Original message |
Reich - American Competitiveness, and the President’s New Relationship with American Business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. "competitiveness" means Americans working for 3rd world wages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. When you compete with sweatshops, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. and working 3 or 4 jobs to eat, 2 hrs sleep and do it again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. US politicians elected by the middle class to serve the needs of the wealthy corporate class nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. “American competitiveness” means "Your CEO's salary must be world-class" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Ha! Reminds me of teaching, when Admins said we couln't ask for salary "parity" with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes, what is good for American people is Not the same as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. Excellent as usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I certainly agree with you on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 11:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I sensed that Obama got it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:09 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. The 1%ers overruled his equitable econ intellectual property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
11. Extremely low wages, gutted safety regs, no health bennies, temp jobs: Voila'! COMPETITIVENESS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC