http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/zontv/2011/01/a_hot_debate_and_final_thought.htmlThis loser can't shut up about Keith. Supposedly he waited till now to "to try and find something positive to say" because he "wanted to be fair" -- yeah, this "fair":
But here is the bottom line: After two days, I cannot think of anything positive to say about Olbermann. He was/is a destructive and dangerous force in the conversation of American politics.
He also says at the end of the blog that the reason he started focusing more on Olbermann, starting two years ago, was "the way President Barack Obama and his White House played Olbermann -- and the way he, in his narcissism and self-importance, allowed himself to be played."
I'll be checking for anything else Zurawik has written on that subject. But first I want to point out that Zurawik apparently is lying in this blog when he says -- after giving the background that Olbermann criticized him in May 2009 for a Reliable Sources appearance when he said MSNBC is dangerous -- that he "included Bill O'Reilly, of Fox News, in that complaint at the time."
Zurawik had focused specifically on MSNBC in his comments in the video of that May 2009 appearance, which I'd seen on the Crooks and Liars website. So I looked for the CNN transcript:
http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0905/24/rs.01.htmlI've looked over Zurawik's comments there several times, and there's no criticism of O'Reilly. Where he's not making general comments, he's specifically criticizing MSNBC and he's particularly nasty about Olbermann. This comment in particular, from that May 2009 show:
Howie, they're speaking for a visceral response. And honestly -- I don't want to overstate this, Howie, and you know from time to time I do -- risk that. But it's really that path lies fascism.
I mean, what we need as a democracy is reliable information. This is the opposite of it.
And by the way, that clip of Olbermann just really, I think, encapsulates it. This is a bizarro world or cartoon version of Edward R. Murrow with the cadence and this arch rhetoric and all this, but he is saying madman stuff.
Nothing at all on that show, from Zurawik, attacking O'Reilly. But Zurawik is apparently counting on no one being able to fact-check him.
Fact-check him, and point out when he deserves to be listed as one of the worst persons in the world.