|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:47 PM Original message |
Texting while walking lady who fell in mall fountain hires lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuclearDem
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh come on, people get embarrassed everyday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Not a comparable example, by a degree of Avogadro's Number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. If she hadn't spoken out, no one would have known who she was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Salviati
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Exactly. She is embarassing herself more in her reaction to the incident, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. My prediction: She will win, and win big. At least, I hope so. "Security" isn't supposed to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Original message |
Why did security push her in the fountain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. TV after You-Tube? As nothing. The point isn't the fountain; it is the JERKS WITH THE CAMERAS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
37. yes. she went on tv and outed herself. no one in the world would've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
19. security camera footage isn't supposed to be posted on you tube. she committed no crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
38. no one said she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
39. She committed the crime of Stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine_Nurse
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
71. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #71 |
80. malls aren't legally "public property". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine_Nurse
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 12:10 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. In open public view then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 04:16 AM Response to Reply #84 |
92. there are federal laws about recording people. malls aren't public spaces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:48 AM Response to Reply #80 |
85. I would bet our supreme court would say differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 04:22 AM Response to Reply #85 |
93. the supreme court is indeed the court that determined malls aren't public spaces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 01:46 PM Original message |
Whether you have free speech and whether you have an expectation of privacy are diff'rnt questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Monk
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
91. Imagine the horror if she'd been chewing gum at the same time as well. THE HORROR!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. can "security" be sued for not coming to her rescue? Is that their job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
102. In a private commercial property context.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #102 |
113. But it was clear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:37 AM Response to Reply #113 |
125. Whether or it is foreseeable that pedestrians in a mall will be distracted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #125 |
133. Distracted by their own phones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. Some jurisdictions have comparative negligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:13 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. Even then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #102 |
114. but that does not necessarily mean a firm hired for "security" has any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #114 |
123. I didn't think she was threatening the security firm per se |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. She doesn't have a prayer for winning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
67. If they were watching her as it happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 07:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
95. deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. Shame on them for throwing that fountain out in front of her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. I believe this is the text book definition of "frivolous lawsuit".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I agree---this is a ridulous lawsuit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. As a citizen, she "gets" to sue anyone she wants. So do you. And it wasn't "someone," it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. I'll agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Book Lover
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
47. So now everyone and anyone has a right to broadcast humiliating footage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Nobody knew who it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
65. So when you are erroneously led thru the mall in handcuffs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
68. She doesn't have a lawsuit yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #68 |
96. Yeah, and the suit may end up not having anything to do with the release of the tape. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #68 |
103. +1 - We have a winner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. Security was probably too busy laughing their asses off, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wah! Fucking Wah! Moron. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
9. If someone had happened to catch her fall with their iphone I'd say to bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. On what possible grounds is she suing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
41. Mall security is not supposed to upload security video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. They can do whatever they want with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ahpook
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #45 |
66. Skip the part about professionalism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. There's no law about professionalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine_Nurse
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
79. They are Mall Ninja's, not the SAS. They have no professionalism.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #45 |
110. No, it was not their video, unless they own the company. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
56. Good point however I think the lack of concern is due to her fraudulent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #56 |
108. I am just addressing the Jerry Springer atmosphere we live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. The private security of a private mall filming their property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #63 |
107. I guess I still expect more of people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #107 |
130. and they will lose their $10. per hour job over lolz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #41 |
64. You're in public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
109. You mean in a society that has no respect for life itself, that tortures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #109 |
116. Tying shit together that really shouldn't be tied together? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #116 |
121. The woman had an accident. She didn't run naked through the mall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:47 AM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Again with false argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:32 PM Response to Reply #41 |
81. Sorry, but you ar comparing apples to oranges here.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
83. I was with you until you used the word 'accident' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:58 AM Response to Reply #83 |
129. You got a point there, stay away from this lady if she is driving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. Wow, her car should have flashing neon lights! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:52 AM Response to Reply #41 |
86. what law is that? not supposed to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 01:54 PM Response to Reply #86 |
105. The example I gave demonstrates the lack of morality and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:56 AM Response to Reply #41 |
89. What reasonable expectation of privacy does she have in a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #89 |
101. Her behavior isn't the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #89 |
106. Well, I'm quite certain no one here has done anything dumb in their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. If someone had happened to catch her fall with their iphone I'd say to bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Oh yeah, mall security=professional! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 07:29 AM Response to Reply #16 |
94. it's ultimately a corporation doing it. a security corporation. if you think it's so funny, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. OTOH, I think that having the fountain placed the way it is without any kind of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:54 AM Response to Reply #14 |
87. have you never been to a place with a fountain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJazz
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. Anybody else thinks this person also texts while driving? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. Security was not very professional by posting this. If it were an individual, it wouldn't be as bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. is being "unprofessional" a basis for a lawsuit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Sometimes. In this case? No opinion beyond saying they were unprofessional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. Apparently it is perfectly ok for security to post videos of others on Youtube. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Non sequitur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
50. That is was a security camera is the point. Very unprofessional of them to post it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:56 AM Response to Reply #20 |
88. security videos are "posted", televised, bought ,sold, and traded every day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
24. Is there any expectation of privacy while walking through a mall with cameras? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. . It was the posting to YouTube, not the fall. YOUTUBE. So any "jokes" about the fountain are point- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
57. She Didn't Fall Into a Toilet She Fell Into a Fountain In Public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
28. She's in a public space. She has zero expectation of privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. +1000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. preach it sister! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Brother, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. Just give her a Darwin award |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
55. Unfortunately she's still able to pass on her idiot genes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. LOLMy bad -She'll probably text while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
73. She didn't die. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
30. Humiliation is nature's way of say "Watch where the fuck you are walking!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 01:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
104. What if she were visually impaired - would you be laughing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. She was visually impaired....by her cellphone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
32. A mall is not a public place. It is only if it is state owned. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Deleted message |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
60. Most states consider a mall a public place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
70. It is in California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
40. it's not like she was laying there bleeding to death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
42. On the bright side, now instead of being the anonymous moron who fell into a fountain.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldlib
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
44. I have heard that she has dropped her lawsuit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Better and better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. Hit and run, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pengillian101
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Good find. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. This can't be! I read she claimed to be a born-again xtian! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
76. Was she born-again before or after she was arrested for credit card theft? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
51. Suing? That's a really humorless response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
53. She just wants money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
59. A sense of humor about it would have made her look better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
62. She humiliated & embarassed herself when she went public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldlib
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
78. She is a very good looking lady. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
72. She's an idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Idiots never do, eh? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Well, you'd be surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
74. I was talking to a co-worker about this the other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
82. I hope that jury after jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
90. She's not all that stupid.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
97. So now, she's not some anonymous blob on a grainy security tape,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Urban Prairie
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #97 |
118. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babydollhead
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
98. I watched it, laughed, and then showed my teenagers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
99. She deserves to spend many thousands of $ on lawyers and then lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
100. I sincerely hope this is thrown out of court. This is the kind of dumbass lawsuit that gives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
111. I'm glad she wasn't physically injured. Beyond that, I have no opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
115. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
117. Few weeks ago, I got up to leave the theater after a movie, and in the darkness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Urban Prairie
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. I had something like that happen to me back in '75 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:16 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Ow. That's pretty negligent of the city--sounds like an accident waiting to happen, and it did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:34 AM Response to Reply #117 |
124. Again, missing the lawsuit point. Security didn't breach ethics by posting your fall ON YOUTUBE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #124 |
132. Where exactly can we find this security firm ethical code of which you speak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
126. HOW many people cannot get that it isn't the "humor", or YOUR own "falls," or the "public space," or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COLGATE4
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:50 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. No. Other posters have correctly pointed out the legal reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
127. Now everyone is laughing at you all over again lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC