|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:40 PM Original message |
Obama says NO to raising age on Social Security! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good. Keep saying no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rko_24550 (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
182. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
189. This is highly MISLEADING. He won't discuss in SOTU. NOT, he won't look at it period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 04:38 PM Response to Reply #189 |
210. Many here do not wanna know the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aggiesal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
206. Now, how about lowering the age? ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thank you, Mr President.!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. That is good to hear. Why doesn't anyone just say raise the CAP? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. He has, several times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. The commission recommended raising the cap. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
75. Raising the age was just one of many recommendations. We haven't heard from Obama about the others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Obama didn't say what the OP claims he said, per the WaHo article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. That's correct. The WaPo actually says he won't be ruling out the Comm. suggestions: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 06:56 AM Response to Reply #80 |
164. and if he does he will pay consequences for it in 2012 /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #164 |
178. The corporate media will reward Obama handsomely, as they are for the tax deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trey9007 (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. I have heard Obama say this plenty of times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
howaboutme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Absolutely it should be raised and expanded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
76. Absolutely - a very easy fix. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 01:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
163. I have a better idea: Get rid of the cap altogether. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
187. It's time the Dems pushed for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. one down -- let's see what happens to the rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. That is a big relief! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. Watch your back folks. This move is made so that we let our guard down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:46 PM Original message |
So he's playing chess *now*? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. haha...touche'. What I do know though is that I will wait for the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Good enough. I'm going to wait for the results as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Please tell me you forgot the sarcasm tag n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. well,isn't that special. You "don't believe a fucking word he says." Bless your little heart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
37. why should that be special? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. You don't see the difference between "don't believe a fucking word he says" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #43 |
85. I do see a difference between not doing everything he wanted to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. me too. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
93. FYI "How Congress helped thwart Obama's plan to close Guantanamo " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. It's the reduction of the payroll tax that will hit Soc. Sec. funding hard and fast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Knight (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
52. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
82. Obama might be 'forced' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
84. The purpose was so they could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
143. Uh, no. There is no reduction of Social Security funding, period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #143 |
172. I'll believe that when I see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #172 |
185. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #185 |
186. We can look forward to the Ides of March for the capitulation, where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matt Shapiro (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #143 |
213. And we can no longer say that Social Security has no effect on the deficit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Deleted message |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. The OP has a misleading subject line. Obama has not said "no" to anything. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. ROFL, this comment could have come straight outta FR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
72. It's a good response to spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
60. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
95. Ahahahahahaha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:44 PM Response to Reply #95 |
100. You didn't read the WaHo article either, did you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
101. Oye vay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 09:47 AM Response to Reply #6 |
171. I will become Janus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
177. Funny, I don't believe a fucking word you say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
218. Oh brother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. This is good news. We need something like this the citizens can depend on ... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
42. And dare we trust that OTHER cuts won't take the place of raising the age? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. Yep, one problem is we can't see between the lines yet. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
15. Let's see if that lasts longer than 15 minutes ... otherwise, GOOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. Deleted message |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. He has never, not once, acted like a typical freeper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
udbcrzy2 (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. Wish he would of said he wasn't going to mess with it at all n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. So you don't want him to raise the cap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
udbcrzy2 (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
90. Yes, that's I thought I just said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 08:09 AM Response to Reply #90 |
165. The "cap" is not the age, its the amount of income at which one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobburgster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #165 |
181. The cap should be eliminated! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. The WaHo article says he won't endorse the cat food commission's recommendation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Wait. You're impugning the source ("WaHo") you're using to make your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I read the article, Robb. Did you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
96. Politispeak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
106. All it says is that he will not reveal what he is willing to capitulate to at this time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #106 |
195. Apparently, nobody read this part of the Article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. Time to move on to the next secret plan he has that proves he's a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Or, fall back on the "mandate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
27. Gosh, all that "progressive" hand-wringing for nothing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Did you read the WaHo article used in the Kos post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. "Obama spoke to Democratic lawmakers over the weekend on his plans to NOT endorse the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. He won't endorse OR take it off the table: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. What's interesting to me is that the specuation surrounding this issue has never been anything BUT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. It not' positive news. It's not news at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Much like the "non" news about Obama raising the SS age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Well, I agree with that. He hasn't committed to that, either. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. I'm sorry if I'm brittle around this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. I understand. What troubles me so much is the seeming desire to believe the worst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. There's no need to believe anything in this instance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #67 |
110. There never was a need to believe anything on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:12 PM Response to Reply #110 |
119. The OP's subject line is misleading. Obama has not rejected raising retirement age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. Were those who suggested for months that he supported raising the SS age |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #121 |
126. The OP's subject line is misleading. Obama has not said "no" to raisng retirement age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:38 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. "Obama won't endorse raising retirement age or reducing Social Security benefits" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #129 |
151. Well, that's wrong. His people say nothing is off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #151 |
156. So we need to see the exact words "off the table" to assume X is not on the table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #156 |
212. They said nothing is off the table. Pretty clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #212 |
214. After not putting anything on the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. it's positive speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:04 PM Response to Reply #63 |
111. Sorry if speculating on the speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
64. Could that possibly be because some of us have a HUGE stake in the outcome, unlike others of you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #64 |
112. What have you personally lost? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #112 |
124. You know, I could make myself vulnerable and actually give a list, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #124 |
130. You mean "friendly" like your continued assertions that my motives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #130 |
141. "woe is me"... how did Democrats get this hard and uncaring? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #141 |
142. "Hey lady," quit assuming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
66. Which is it???? I hate double speak...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. It's a wash per the WaHo article, not a "no". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 08:35 AM Response to Reply #35 |
168. It seems like he's just saying "I won't say yes, I won't say no" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #168 |
215. Seems like he's saying I don't support the commission recommendations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 08:23 PM Response to Reply #215 |
217. Seems like he said "nothing is off the table". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 11:58 PM Response to Reply #217 |
219. Seems like you're beating a dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-26-11 03:38 AM Response to Reply #219 |
221. Back at ya... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. I did a lot of hand-wringing. He got a lot of mail and calls.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
107. Perhaps he should comment on a Senator's direct question. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #107 |
113. Perhaps he should wait until the state of the union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
105. Hand wringing strengthens the hands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:12 PM Response to Reply #105 |
118. Unnecessary handwringing makes for sweaty palms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
33. Sweet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. Sounds like a negotiable position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Read the rest of the paragraph from where you snipped it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. I don't see that particular final sentence in the washington post article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. This is the paragraph: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. More importantly, Obama hasn't committed to raising the age of SS. He hasn't even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
71. The OP said he said no. That didn't happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #71 |
116. Speaking to lawmakers and clarifying he does NOT endorse the recommendations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. He does not endorse the recommendations and he does not reject them either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:18 PM Response to Reply #117 |
120. That's an interesting new standard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #120 |
125. No, it's not. The OP claims he took a position and he did not. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. He took a postion not to endorse the recommendations of his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Nope. He isn't endorsing and he's not taking their recommendations off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:46 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. One can't take something off the table if it was never on the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Have you read the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:56 PM Response to Reply #134 |
137. Yes. We've been over this question. Have you read the numerous reports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #137 |
150. Obama has not rejected the Cat Food Commission's recomendations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:43 PM Response to Reply #150 |
155. Yes he has. If we're going by the WAPO article, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #155 |
205. The WaPo article says he has not taken their proposals off the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #205 |
216. When were they on the friggen table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #51 |
197. He's a politician. He's not stupid. Announcing a very unpopular measure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-26-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #197 |
220. Death politically, would be imposing an unpopular measure. Especially when the poster boy for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. I understand he didn't commit to anything and much like the public option or his deals with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. That is strange. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
39. And President Obama also told lawmakers that he was strongly for the public option. Remember that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #39 |
122. And we needed 60 votes in the senate for the public option, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
40. I hope, I mean REALLY hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
55. The Washington Post article doesn't say he's rejected raising the age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
69. Exactly. Purging people from disability, because we are INVISIBLE and don't raise any waves, could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
50. So President Obama isn't ruling out Social Security cuts or raising the retirement age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. He's not ruling out lowering the age of retirement either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #56 |
91. Obama's also not ruling out doubling social security payments. So what's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #91 |
115. You have my point. He's not done anything worthy of your blind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. bless your heart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #50 |
61. 32 recs in for a noncommittal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. When people go on and on about how Obama is going to ENDORSE such cuts during the SOTU, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #74 |
86. Doesn't matter if he 'endorses', |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. The Waho article says he won't endorse OR take it off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #61 |
87. 44 recs and people aren't reading the WaHo article that the Kos diary is based on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #61 |
191. +1 for a necessary reality check. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
81. The pattern is there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
136. Thanks for pointing that out. For a minute there, I wanted to believe the OP's wording. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #50 |
174. That's the way I see it, too. Can they do that without a public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #174 |
207. This does have the potential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #207 |
211. Great post, shimmergal. I agree with everything you said. I hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
70. Inaccurate thread headline. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
73. The cuts are "not off the table." Why is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #73 |
133. Because he's going to allow Ryan and others to draw a contrast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
77. Hoyer willing to "adjust" SS for present retirees. Take it OFF the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
79. OregonBlue, Obama did not say "No" to anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:36 PM Response to Reply #79 |
97. Seems to me he said no to the deficit commission's recommendations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:37 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. Nope. The WaHo article says he won't endorse or take them off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:23 AM Response to Reply #98 |
161. He never said they were on the table in the first place so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #97 |
198. Why don't you hear what a WH official said about the fiscal commission? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:34 PM Response to Reply #79 |
152. OregonBlue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
83. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
92. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
94. Not what the WP story said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
99. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
102. Senator Sanders: "I applaud the president for standing up for Social Security." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #102 |
109. have you ever wondered how your post right there will be glossed over in lieu of more rage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. Glossed over? What about quietly ignored because the Wrong is so embarrassing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 09:23 AM Response to Reply #114 |
169. you seem to think you can make up your own facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #102 |
123. He's clearly deluded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
103. Cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
104. President Obama, stand and do not falter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
108. I would much prefer to read this headline: "President Obama pledges to protect Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #108 |
140. He needn't say these words until Republicans show their hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
132. "Your lips may say no-no, but your eyes say yes-yes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. 60 votes for a misleading headline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #135 |
139. "Depressing"...and typical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #139 |
145. 114 recommendations for this crap, yet we're depressed when the President says he doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. Shhhhhh!. These aren't the droids you're looking for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. I'm sure your post has great meaning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. Awwwwww. You don't get my use of "popular culture"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:39 PM Response to Reply #148 |
153. I'm not sure if you're insinuating that Obama is akin to Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:56 PM Response to Reply #153 |
184. Good heavens, no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #146 |
176. Ha Ha Perfecto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #145 |
149. A half truth and frankly, it's appalling to see you promoting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #149 |
154. Is calling something crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
138. The thing about lines in the sand is they are SO easy to obliterate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
144. So why would he want to bother with that anyway. Taxes being paid into SS have been slashed and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
157. Obama says NO to tax cuts for the rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #157 |
175. Right. Some here just don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
158. Another thread says the SOTU speech's language will be much more nuanced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
159. Yay...a non-commitment to any course of action! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-11 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
160. Rah-fucking-rah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
162. More Morsels for Morris |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
166. This week. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
167. You mean he was even considering the alternative?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
170. Thank Christ, Allah, Vishnu, Apollo, Ahura Mazda, random chance or common sense for that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonnieS (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
173. I think I was at least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
179. Not even bothering to promise a veto? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobburgster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
180. Damn! Didn't make it too far down the responses before .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #180 |
202. If you read the article, all it says is that it won't be discussed in SOTU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
florida08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
183. ok..read between the lines here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
decidedlyso (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #183 |
188. Yes, that rationale has some merit, but it is diminished by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
florida08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #188 |
193. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #183 |
194. "Bipartisanship" between the death-to-SS Republicans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
florida08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #194 |
203. I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
190. "but cautioned that he is unlikely to rule them off the table, either." Sorry. Lame. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
192. Unrec. because headline is flatly inaccurate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
196. Yes but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
199. Deleted message |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #199 |
201. Go take your right wing BS to a right wing site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #199 |
208. Well, bully for your dad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pam4water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
200. Tune in tomorrow for his next potion on the retirement age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
204. Well, this is good to know. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-25-11 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
209. Obama says No, I repeat, Obama says No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC