|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
deminks
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:09 PM Original message |
Thomas Says He Erred on Disclosure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wilt the stilt
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. He doesn't hear anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. So, does this mean Clarence actually prepares his own tax returns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. "nadvertently". BULLSHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. LIAR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. What? He didn't know that all income must be declared? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. Still a lying sack of shit, isn't he? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. I say he is dumber than a post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my2sense
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. How much of this nonsense will be allowed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. With Geithner at Treasury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Why would Geithner or Treasury have anything to do with this? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. he pretty much used the same excuse to justify evading taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Yeah, but you do realize that Justice Thomas hasn't evaded taxes, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 06:40 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. actually what Geitner did was worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:39 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Not only that but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. Can we just impeach him now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. If this were a liberal justice House Repubs would be talking impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annm4peace
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
12. It is against the law to fail to disclose income |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. But, but, but, the law's complicated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. Does he even know what that word means? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm tired of these damn excuses for breaking laws & ethics boundaries! You're fired, Thomas! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. tax fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. No. Ethical breach, yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. Not much of a judge when he can't follow the law, he should be impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
25. Scalia told him not to worry about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
26. This is bullcrap shiny thing stuff to distract from the Thomas' connections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
27. What? He's never heard of H&R Block? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
28. Liar. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CanonRay
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
29. I filled out those forms for 28 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bulloney
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
30. One of the 9 top judges in the land INADVERTENTLY omitted such basic info on his wife's employment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC