IL Supreme Court issues a stay (?) and says to put Rahm's name back on the
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:03 PM
Original message |
IL Supreme Court issues a stay (?) and says to put Rahm's name back on the |
|
ballot.
Andrea Mitchell just reported it - no link.
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's idiotic to throw him off the ballot.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Xithras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Did they offer a reason? |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I don't know if it was just a comment/opinion by Andrea or if they (Supreme Court) indicated |
|
that if someone is in the nation's Capitol serving the country, that should not affect residential status in home state. :shrug:
|
Xithras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Sorry, I've been through this in other threads. |
|
Rahm wasn't serving his country. He was employed by it. There's a difference.
Any argument for his maintaining his residency could also be made for any postal delivery worker who moves to a town 100 miles away to take a delivery job. Or by ANY government employee ANYWHERE who moves to work elsewhere.
He wasn't SENT by the government or the people to serve elsewhere...he went to Washington to chase employment. He moved.
Besides that, he's scum, and I don't want him running for any position anywhere.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. I'm not the one who offered that opinion, just reporting I'd heard it, acknowledging |
|
I wasn't certain of the source.
No need to convince me of your views. I'm not the one making any decisions.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Probably so arrangements can be made to print ballots with his name; |
|
the case will continue. Time crunch there.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Although in NYS the case would easily be made that it was "always his intention" to return to his "home".
While I hate the DLC, I think Rham had a case that he was a resident, more or less..
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I think it's up to the people of IL -- if they really want him, he should be allowed |
|
to run.
Didn't Cheney do a bogus "resident" thing? I'm thinking others have, too. Rahm's claim is more valid than others' IMO.
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. Ding ding DING!1 CHEENEE's blatant law breaking was there from the start |
|
And by "start" (since he was a permanent Rethug regime fixture) I mean his de facto pResidency.
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Good. I hope the ILSC lets the people decide who they want as Mayor. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 01:32 PM by Pirate Smile
The IL SC hasn't even said that they will hear the case yet but this will stop Rahm from being screwed by not being on the ballot for early voting which starts in less then a week.
|
ItNerd4life
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Yes, because laws are made to be broken. Just what Chicago needs! |
|
Let's elect a new mayor and his first act is to break the law! woohoo, Chicago politics at it's best!
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Shocking. Simply shocking. |
|
:sarcasm:
How utterly predictable.
:thumbsdown:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.