|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:13 PM Original message |
FAIL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. Was this necessary with your other thread too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Is there now a limit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Thank you. It's always refreshing to have a Board Nanny present. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. At least your other thread had some real thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
94. Agree, this thread is kind of dumb, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Why? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
79. Because there are some amongst those who call themselves "the Left" who OWN the truth just as absolu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soleft
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Here we go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. 85%+ posotive - get a grip n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
45. Ditto. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 06:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
97. What does that prove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:04 AM Response to Reply #97 |
99. 85% of the speech was positive IMO, not poll approval n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. this thread is a fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:16 PM Original message |
. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. Bunch of speechifying without any specifics. Useless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Like every other SOTU speech before this. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Like every speech every politician gives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. What specifics were you expecting from a SOTU? Ain't gonna happen. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Ok. I get it. You're right. I'm wrong. End of commentary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Deleted message |
L0oniX
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. I was waiting to hear about the new tea tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. He's a politician, last time I checked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. Deleted message |
Lex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
13. Can't argue with that reasoning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. Memo didn't get to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. Wow... as someone who has watched SOTU's since the early 70's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. The content was a worthless embrace of a failed system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. NO, it was a reaffirmation of ideals that made us (once) great... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:39 PM Response to Reply #25 |
42. It's a popular delusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
16. But he railed against tax cuts for the rich... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:21 AM Response to Reply #16 |
92. You mean as in "lower the corporate tax rate"? That kind of railing? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:10 AM Response to Reply #92 |
100. And closing loopholes for a net loss of corporate income of...0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. Terrible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. I just heard that recently. Where is that from? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickyt
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Lloyd Bridges' character in "Airplane!" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
19. I was unimpressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'll bet you the the post speech respondents don't think it was a FAIL.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pisces
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. No, just you. Grab a paddle for your thoughts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammytko
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
24. Go to bed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
26. Deleted message |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
27. He calls for allowing military recruiters back on campuses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. He desperately wants some GOP fanboys. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:52 PM Original message |
Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
53. DIDN'T like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
namahage
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
60. Which campuses successfully banned military recruiters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
88. I thought the reason campuses banned them was because of discrimination against gay people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
28. I think you incorrect, sir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
31. Biggest chain of RW talking points I've heard in a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
33. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
37. Deleted message |
Raine
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
38. On point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
39. Deleted message |
parasim
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
43. What did you expect from the NOSO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Looks like a Gameshow Host convention to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiffenPoof
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
46. Looks Like I Didn't Miss Anything n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
47. Har! Flash poll results provided by our own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
48. Thought I was watching Perry in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
50. That's rather absolutist of you.+ Doesn't ANYTHING depend upon what WE Do about our own problems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
51. This won't break zero rec's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. But it can be kicked to the top. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:23 AM Response to Reply #56 |
93. It can? Are you sure about that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
52. Somebody please call Will Pitt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
54. He gives good speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. I thought it was a little dull. There were several things I liked: commitment to Infrastructure & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. I didn't hear him reaffirming the Dream Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. He didn't use it's title, but there were references to how certain people could be contributing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Monk
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
55. PILE ON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Some OP's beg for it n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Safetykitten
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
61. 2012 here we come. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
62. The guy is pro big business all the way and more than needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. There were direct references to taxes that hurt small businesses and trade policies that do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. He is pro big biz, don't care if you won't acknowledge that fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:34 PM Response to Reply #72 |
84. Again, you prove my point. "There is one truth and only one truth and it is MINE." wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Perhaps your perceptions are shaped by your "corporate suit" expectations. Not that I don't hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. No just based on his former dealings/policies at a senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:22 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. You prove my point. You already "know", so you hear/see what you "know". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:24 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Wrong, you believe opposite of what I say and will 'know' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:29 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Wrong, I believe what you say and I believe the opposite of what you say, because I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:30 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. You, on the other hand, apparently, believe that you can calculate ALL probabilities of all factors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. No, I believe you are right in some ways and wrong in others. You, on the other hand, believe you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
64. What do the extremely displeased want from this speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuclearDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Poor Obama, always derided. He could rescue a kitten! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuclearDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:22 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. Oh, knock it off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Then knock off your ridiculous "Obama could _____ & people would bitch" schtick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:23 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. he'd probably just boot the cat in the brains too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. Please don't make fun of our President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Sorry. THUD!! : |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:36 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. Wow. Now that is a fine piece of man meat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
70. I honestly believe you're correct, Will.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
71. Word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
83. Yes, it's a pity he doesn't pass the purity test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lutefisk
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
87. "The most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
89. Corporate TOOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
90. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
91. Depressing as hell, isn't it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
delightfulstar
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
95. Kick.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Foo Fighter
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 11:32 PM Response to Reply #95 |
106. You're lucky you have places that close to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 05:48 AM Response to Original message |
96. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
98. Deleted message |
boston bean
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:11 AM Response to Reply #98 |
102. that's sort of nasty and ballsy to ask that, don't you think? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
101. no, it wasnt a fail. and no.... it is not true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
103. Dire pronouncement about the deep shit we're in #5,679,392 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
104. Not a game changing speech for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
105. Can't argue with that - because there's nothing in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC