|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:33 PM Original message |
***** Official LIVE BLOG Senate = Filibuster Reform Debate ***** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sen. Merkley "The secret filibuster must go" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thanks, L. Coyote! I didn't even know it was on. Tuned in now, and of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Lamar Alexander seems to be working on being as boring as possible, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. He IS a natural |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Well this kind of answers my question posted below. This is encouraging, anyway -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Question -- any idea how this is projected to go? I've heard that both sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. See my link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. Today in Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Senators Harkin, Udall (NM) and Merkley will offer their full proposals for actual filibuster reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. Durbin up = in favor of changing filibuster rules "Why are we doing this?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. Daily Kos action email engine to tell your Senators how you'd like them to vote on reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. Grassley: Secrecy is the ONLY thing this resolution addresses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
14. Wyden of Oregon: "No legitimate reason" for Senators to keep holds secret. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. WAY TO GO SENTATOR WYDEN !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. NOW: Wyden-Grassley-McCaskill resolution relative to "secret holds" subject to a 60-vote threshold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
16. Lautenberg sponsored a "Mr. Smith" bill! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Harkin giving a great speech "The minority has unchecked veto power over public policy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "something inherently unconstitutional about this" SO TRUE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. Harkin: American people "want an end to dysfunction" and other tidbits, best speech in forever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. "the world's greatest non-deliberative body" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
22. 4:30 PM EST = Voting on SR 11 to eliminate secret holds (Wyden, McCaskill, Grassley) = roll call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Sounds like it will be a unanimous vote. Wait, a NO just sounded from Lee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Mr. DeMint = NO, Mr. Ensign = NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. 92 to 4 PASSES ===== No More Secret Holds in the Senate ===== |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. UP NEXT = Udall (CO) SR 29, regarding waiving the reading of an amendment ( 60-votes ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. PASSES 81 to 15 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. S.Res. 8 by Harkin = Reducing votes needed to break filibusters = 84 NAY and 12 YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
29. Up NOW: SR 10 - Quickly going to votes = Changes rules on time allowed to debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. SR 21 (Merkley) vote NOW = Requires Senators on floor and speaking continuously to filibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. NOT agreed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
32. Thank you for doing this, & posting the outcomes to each vote. Sen. Harkin's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. You have discovered my real pseudonym perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC