|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
William769
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:09 PM Original message |
When did Hillary seize power from President Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. The primaries are over. Let it go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Has nothing to do with the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
October
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
40. Well, she doesn't answer to you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Play coy all you want, and if thats not the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. +100000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. ??? As SOS, she is high profile now.... SO what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. just asking. i hear that phrase a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demmiblue
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. She didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well, she is old enough to be his mother. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Yes if she gave birth at the age of 14. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. oh damn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
70. they grow up fast in Park Ridge... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
57. wish she was my mom. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know what you're referring to, but she's saying whatever they decided the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thank you, thats exactly my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
45. Subtlety doesn't work here anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. She may be a corporatist but she's the consumate professional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. When she won the primaries and lost the caucuses? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. LOL WUT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. She'll be on Meet The Press tomorrow,looking forward to seeing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. What makes you think that Obama ever had power? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Exactly. To answer OP, though, it would be Jan1993 when Bill sided with secrecy and privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
44. oh the deflection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Yeah, because in YOUR world nothing bad came of Clinton protecting Reagan-Bush's global agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 01:41 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. You're happy with the results of Clinton siding with Reagan-Bush's secrecy thru the 90s and I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. I'm not living in the 90's I'm living in today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
68. The issue is that you DON'T recognize how actions of the 90s led to the globe's current problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
53. So................. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. It is Obama's fault to a point...he relies far too much Clinton influence on foreign policy and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:21 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. So Bush's presidency was also narrowed after all he was before President Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. Power was narrowed down TO BushInc and the powerful elite because Clinton served their agenda and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. Who would you rather have answer that 3 am call n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. neither one. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. oh, for God's sake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Which god? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. any will do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Good enough. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. I still think she might run against Obama in the primaries ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. God, kill me with a spoon or a fork |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. It would be a horribly slow death. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Deleted message |
Gaedel
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. If you suppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. N.E.V.E.R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
54. Please, the woman should have been president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. I think it was in the bathroom on Air Force 1.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
26. Are you playing dumb? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
27. Unrec because of teh stupid. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. +1...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
31. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
33. It's her job. She's the Secretary of State who speaks for the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
34. Unrec'd it ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
36. With the question mark (?) at the end, 'just asking' was sorta obvious. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. If it would've had a period, he would've typed "Just sayin'." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
37. Deleted message |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
41. Wouldn't Kissinger speak in such a circumstance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #41 |
49. I'm surprised they haven't trotted out Kissinger yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
47. What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
48. She didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
52. March 14th, 2014, backed by Skynet. N.T. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
55. Obama is still president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. you promised to be good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. I can't hep it, it's in my nature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Some people understood what this thread was about, others? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. or you don't understand Bea and I's sense of rapport.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. Dionysus doesn't mean anything by it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 05:23 PM Response to Reply #65 |
74. let see that grin when there's no banky to keep you warm on a cold winter day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Not fair!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. fine. take it. *harumph* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. That was not very gracious, but I'll take it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-11 10:05 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. we have a huge storm coming and i just gave you my last banky... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Well, I'm not selfish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. thx Bea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
56. This was the plan all along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
60. You should never use Hillary's name and the word "seize" in the same sentence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Maybe it conjures it in YOUR mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LawnLover
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
63. She lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. It would be nice if you knew what you were talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LawnLover
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Uh-huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
71. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Monk
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
72. IBTT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-11 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
76. don't bogart that joint |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-11 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
81. Huh? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC