Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This sentencing one for the books

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:49 PM
Original message
This sentencing one for the books

http://www.omaha.com/article/20110130/NEWS97/701309858#this-sentencing-one-for-the-books

Published Sunday January 30, 2011

By Todd Cooper
WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

It was the zaniest sentencing hearing several attorneys had seen.

In Douglas County District Judge Peter Bataillon’s courtroom last week, Princeston Scott sat convicted of shooting his stepdad three times.

Now, a young man shooting his stepdad three times is strange, but that wasn’t the zany part of this case.

Nor was it that the wounded stepdad sat just seven chairs away from his ex-wife, who has a protection order that prohibits him from being within 100 feet of her. Nor that the ex-wife wagged a finger in her ex-husband’s face.

Nor that the judge thrice declared Scott a “knucklehead” — and then got into a debate with Scott’s mother over whether her son truly was one.

No, the zany part of the sentencing was this: After Bataillon described the sordid family feud, one man stood up, took the blame and apologized for his actions.

FULL story at link..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Except for the shooting conviction,
it sounds like every episode of Judge Judy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. 3 to 7 years, what a miscarriage of justice
The judge should be disbarred for his unprofessional name calling and it's obvious indication that he can't objectively determine the case.

Psycho ex-husband terrorizes family and they had to shoot him in self defense. Even the guy he shot came to his senses and can see that it was justified. Bataillon is just butt sore that people refuse to be victims of our shitty legal system that does nothing to protect women from abusive ex-husbands. Getting a gun to protect yourself from someone repeatedly coming to your house to confront you isn't escalation, it is common sense. The only way to know it was a "word-fight" is to pretend that you can see into the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC