Wikipedia contributions heavily skewed to one gender: 85% vs 15%

[KurtNYC]

(Please note: 'contributions' here is used to refer to articles written; not money contributions)

I had no idea...

About a year ago, the Wikimedia Foundation, the organization that runs Wikipedia, collaborated on a study of Wikipedia’s contributor base and discovered that it was barely 13 percent women; the average age of a contributor was in the mid-20s, according to the study by a joint center of the United Nations University and Maastricht University.

Sue Gardner, the executive director of the foundation, has set a goal to raise the share of female contributors to 25 percent by 2015, but she is running up against the traditions of the computer world and an obsessive fact-loving realm that is dominated by men and, some say, uncomfortable for women.

Her effort is not diversity for diversity’s sake, she says. “This is about wanting to ensure that the encyclopedia is as good as it could be,” Ms. Gardner said in an interview on Thursday. “The difference between Wikipedia and other editorially created products is that Wikipedians are not professionals, they are only asked to bring what they know.”
...
According to the OpEd Project, an organization based in New York that monitors the gender breakdown of contributors to “public thought-leadership forums,” a participation rate of roughly 85-to-15 percent, men to women, is common — whether members of Congress, or writers on The New York Times and Washington Post Op-Ed pages.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html?src=ISMR_AP_LO_MST_FB

It is hard for me to believe it is that skewed to males. The women I know are open and expressive, well-informed and opinionated. Btw, I wonder what DU's skew is?

[jody]

1. RE: "women I know are open and expressive, well-informed and opinionated" Please send phone # nt

[KurtNYC]

2. just come to NYC, anytime

we are over run by stylish, confident women.

[jody]

3. My granddaughter is one. nt