Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting article on this month's employment report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:07 PM
Original message
Interesting article on this month's employment report
Essentially, some people think that the unemployment rate drop was not due to a shrinking labor market (i.e. discouraged workers giving up the job search) so much as the fact that many new jobs were created in new businesses and start-ups and these are not captured in the other "Jobs created vs. lost" survey.

Food for thought, anyway.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/04/usa-economy-jobs-surveys-idUSN0416798020110204

From the article:
The Labor Department's headline figure showed a paltry 36,000 jobs created in January, well short of analysts' expectations for 145,000. So why did the jobless rate drop to 9 percent last month, its lowest level since April 2009?

Below are some questions and answers on why the unemployment rate and jobs count can send such seemingly differing signals and how economists called it so wrong.

snip

Part of the reason is the way the Labor Department conducts its survey of employers. If you were paid at all, even for just one hour, during the survey reference pay period -- the pay period containing the 12th of the month -- you are considered employed for purposes of the report.

The government may also be undercounting jobs coming from newly created businesses, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said. The agency has to find businesses in order to poll them, and it takes time to discover newly opened companies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. Usually small & new companies are missed at least initially.
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 01:15 PM by Statistical
They are included in future month revisions.

Say kber Inc. started in January and hired 10 people. It then expanded the workforce to 15 in Feb, and 20 in March.

The BLS finally finds Kber Inc in April. Rather than say +20 jobs in April. It is +0 Jobs in April and January is revised +10, Febuary and March each revised +5.


This is BLS surveys both business and employed/unemployed directly. They are two separate surveys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not only that....
Consider the enormous number of newly started internet businesses. I wonder how many of them have a business license and/or report earnings of any kind.

Personally, I know of three just in my circle of friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC