Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vermont plant OK belies Obama nuclear review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 04:20 PM
Original message
Vermont plant OK belies Obama nuclear review


Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, Vt. is pictured. | AP Photo
The Vt. plant, which has the same design as the stricken Japanese plant, has been relicensed. | AP Photo Close
By DARIUS DIXON | 3/25/11 10:06 AM EDT

Anti-nuclear activists around the country have seized on the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi facility in Japan to argue that the death knell of the nuclear industry is finally at hand. But economics may be the more dangerous foe, if the case in Vermont is a guide.

Monday, the same day the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced it would conduct a 90-day "snapshot" regulatory review of the U.S. nuclear reactor fleet, the agency finalized the relicensing of the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant — which has the same design as the stricken Japanese plant — for another 20 years.

Vermont Yankee is actually scheduled to close next year anyway, but the NRC's action leads to questions about the comprehensive nuclear review President Barack Obama called for.

"It is stunning that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission would rubber stamp the use of this aging reactor for another two decades, and it's outrageous that it would do so just days after announcing a 90-day review in response to the crisis in Japan," said Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51935.html#ixzz1HeVzC3S7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, it will be included in the 90 day review

I don't understand the criticism here.

The re-licensing application was supposed to be suspended, regardless of how long it has been in the pipeline? Is that it?

The review which has been ordered, at least as I understand it, doesn't require anything to be unplugged or taken offline. Was there some sort of moratorium order that I missed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Re-licensing is a sham...
the NRC has NEVER said no! The people of Vermont voted to close the plant when it's license expired. If you don't know the history of Vermont Yankee and its problems, please read up on it!

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm quite familiar with Vermont Yankee
Edited on Fri Mar-25-11 07:04 PM by jberryhill
...and once met the fellow who took down the meteorological tower during pre-construction studies of the Seabrook site in New Hampshire.

And, yes, relicensing is a sham.

Those facts have nothing to do with the charge leveled in the OP that somehow everything in motion was supposed to come to a standstill because an overall review was ordered.

How about you google my last name and nuclear power, and learn a bit of my personal history before you accuse me of ignorance. K?

Because... Later this weekend, I will be posting some interesting information for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. How about...
you read something carefully before you go off half-cocked. I don't think i accused you of ignorance at all! Here's what I said:

"If you don't know the history of Vermont Yankee and its problems, please read up on it!"


Note the 'If you don't know' part... i bolded it for you, just in case you didn't get it. I even said please and added a smilie!

Oh and BTW, i don't personally believe it's a stretch to think decisions made on re-licensing should wait until after the review is finished. I actually would have assumed that to be the case. 90 days isn't really that long to wait and Vermont Yankee has been trying to get its extension for over 2 years now... oh and one of my neighbors down the road worked at the plant as it was built. He spent 3 years there as a maintenance engineer and plumber... he's a farmer now, but he's got tons of stories about the substandard building practices employed at the plant.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Here, you want something interesting
Edited on Fri Mar-25-11 11:38 PM by jberryhill
I shot the pictures in this post myself:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x743123

That doesn't change the fact that the OP conflates two things which do not have any connection with each other - the re-licensing, and the newly ordered review - in order to make a political point.

Hang on for the comment period when that review report is completed. But if the re-licensing was halted when no such moratorium was in effect, would simply be asking for a lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prohaira Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fascists/Dominionists seem to believe anything is safe if it only kills someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait. That's not supposed to happen in vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC