|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:21 PM Original message |
Liberals disapprove of Wikileaks 64%-30%, Democrats disapprove 79%-19% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. Where did you get those numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Sorry, edited to add link n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Go to the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. Better link with comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. selfdelete, responded to wrong post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. Im surprised I am in a minority in both groups. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. I say that poll is a big stinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Or maybe just not the numbers you want? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
71. Deleted message |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
92. I don't know a Dem in real life who thinks that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 03:22 AM Response to Reply #92 |
122. I am not sure I do either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #92 |
214. Nor do I. Not in real life or online. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #92 |
229. Me neither! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #92 |
262. I greatly support WikiLeaks and Assange -- so do most here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. This was the question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 07:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
249. Push poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #249 |
257. Happy New Year, Le Taz Hot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 03:42 AM Response to Reply #249 |
270. How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #249 |
282. How is that a push poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
264. The poll question leads, but it does demonstrate how susceptible people are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
66. DU said the same thing during the elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #66 |
232. I say that any poll asking for an opinion on a topic already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
83. I say the same to all polls that do not agree with what I believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
130. For certain BS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 07:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
259. Deleted message |
tularetom
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. If those numbers are correct we are in deeper shit than I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I think it's time you and I and our like-thinking sisters and brothers rethink what we are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. As a liberal and a Democrat, I wholeheartly approve of Wikileaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbperrin
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. As both, I also hope they keep it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
210. As a Liberal and a Democrat, I too totally approve of Wikileaks, also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #210 |
215. Totally agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sancho
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. I doubt that's a valid number, but it doesn't matter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. Oh, "Still a Democrat", I bet the number is 189% disapprove!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. Their question is ridiculous. With a similar question, i could get anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. You should say 'Americans' not 'liberals'. Most Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. So 1000 older Americans are given a leading question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. putin is an alpha dog is govt corruption and war crime? wow. didnt know. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. Deleted message |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 12:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
115. Putin being an alpha dog should be classified? Wow, indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:58 AM Response to Reply #115 |
153. so it isnt about govt corruption and war crimes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:03 AM Response to Reply #153 |
154. Clearly that's not what I said. The 1% of cables so far show outrageous, routine corruption & crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:29 AM Response to Reply #154 |
156. why do you people assume i dont know. 1% released are crimes. 1 friggin % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #156 |
159. Because you have once again demonstrated that you don't know anything about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #159 |
161. again with the personal attacks. listen to you. we can only judge the cables that have come out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #161 |
163. Individual privacy is not the same as institutional secrecy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:06 AM Response to Reply #163 |
167. in your opinion i did. but i can state easily the reason why you must resort to stating they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #167 |
171. Please inform yourself about the stories that have come out from the State Department cables so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #171 |
172. you keep repeating yourself. i am informed. is it clear yet, or do i have to say it slower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:48 AM Response to Reply #172 |
175. Very sad. You're back to "Putin as alpha dog" as though this is the only thing that came out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #175 |
189. no. i am back to putin the alpha dog because that is what i responded to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #189 |
196. Okaythanks. You're obviously not interested, but I know that many people are interested, so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:43 PM Response to Reply #196 |
202. i am not much into games jack. too childish.... your post is beyond absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #202 |
220. I think we can leave this to the judgement of the readers, if there are any. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #220 |
221. ah. so your performance was for the fellow readers? hm. again. games. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #221 |
223. I don't know why seabeyond distracts and attacks. It's sad. Please follow this link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #223 |
225. lol. you are replying to seabeyond. it is real clear what i was saying. you dont know why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #225 |
227. There's no point in replying to seabeyond, as s/he is not interested in following this link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #227 |
228. wow. now you are just being odd. ok. whatever... lol. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #223 |
280. This is why seabeyond distracts and attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:10 AM Response to Reply #280 |
295. what you do on this thread, you did on that thread. no, my behavior doesnt suggest what you make up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:56 AM Response to Reply #295 |
297. Blah, blah, blah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #297 |
299. what does husband have to do with anything? consistently yawl go after the person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #299 |
300. Project much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #300 |
301. project much? i am talking about the subject. the issue. you are talking about me. then my hubby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:52 PM Response to Reply #301 |
302. Pure comedy gold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #221 |
273. This reader agrees strongly with Jack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 05:33 AM Response to Reply #196 |
247. PLUS ONE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 09:17 AM Response to Reply #247 |
250. Thank you! ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #189 |
272. Sorry, you are completely uninformed on this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #272 |
276. Ouch! Thanks EOTE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:41 AM Response to Reply #276 |
278. It's amazing what some people will defend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #159 |
298. I don't remember reading 1,947 unique scandels from the cables |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #156 |
233. 1% of the cables have been released is what he meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:09 PM Response to Reply #233 |
235. why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #235 |
237. Okay, then since you ARE informed, what has been released |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #237 |
239. putin being an alpha dog.... lol. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 01:00 AM Response to Reply #239 |
244. Well, the cables did reveal that U.S. officials did believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #153 |
209. Sure it is. It is about corruption, war crimes and the other stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #209 |
212. yup. well see, that is all. would have been so much easier without all the deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #209 |
222. Good luck tekisui! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. And you assume they are older because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. The report shows that they have no data for 18-34 year olds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
39. Yes I assumed about older folks...am I wrong? Still doesn't take away from my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
265. The bias in your question is more equivalent to one like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 03:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
271. how is it leading? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. Who gives a shit about a CNN telephone poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. I don't care if fucking 99% of liberals disapprove of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
110. Agree on that completely. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #19 |
117. +1000 N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. From the comments... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
23. In a related story, 82 percent of DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Oh yeah... CNN is a great source for unbiased information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
73. And that mirrors what I see from the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:34 PM Response to Reply #23 |
81. Come on! CNN, Faux News Lite! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Midway Rebel
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
24. A CNN poll: A sample of 1008 and a tainted poll question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
150. 1000 is a typical poll size |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:58 AM Response to Reply #150 |
152. "Samping error of 3%" is a religious invocation, not a scientific statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #152 |
181. No, it means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #181 |
198. "If you assume the only error is Poisson noise" is a giant leap of faith. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #181 |
234. If you are going to conduct a poll, you should poll people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
193. How in the question "tainted?" What is the problem some here seem to have with the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 09:24 AM Response to Reply #193 |
251. Not to say that almost all questions are tainted but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #251 |
258. Deleted message |
The Midway Rebel
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 01:09 AM Response to Reply #193 |
266. Here is my problem with the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #266 |
294. lolol That poor dog!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. May 2003 79% of U.S. citizens believed invading Iraq was justified. (CNN Poll) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
70. +1 .. wasn't there also a poll that most Americans, before the iraq war.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulka38
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #26 |
254. Nearly all of them thought a WMD attack by Saddam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
27. I will not fret about it. We all knew there was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Yep. Only confirmed what we already knew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
29. yikes if everybody else believes in molesting children does that mean we should go along with it? n |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
30. Most Americans don't know/understand the basic notion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
33. Goes beyond right-wing or left-wing, conservative or liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
34. I have problems with some of what WikiLeaks did, and how they went about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. They are not throwing everything against the wall. This is one of the Zombie Lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. I was under the impression they were vetting it only to filter-out certain things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Actually, they are letting the newspapers take the lead on what subjects to report... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #47 |
61. Well, that's not so awful, then. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
93. :) Nope, it isn't! Happy New Year! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:56 AM Response to Reply #61 |
131. It is not awful at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DragonSlave
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
52. So who gets to be gatekeeper then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:59 AM Response to Reply #52 |
132. I love your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #52 |
173. "When I think of treason, I don't think of Wikileaks, I think of Iran-Contra" - DragonSlave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:07 PM Response to Reply #52 |
185. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
219. Exactly. Just because a majority of Americans are cowards, it doesn't mean WL is wrong to do this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 03:32 AM Response to Reply #34 |
123. Do you have any clue how Wikileaks has been operating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #123 |
128. Thank you for explaining it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. Why in heavens name do you disapprove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
51. Compromises our interests and endangers lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. Yet no evidence to substantiate that belief. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. And not one shred of proof presented to support their accusations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:13 AM Response to Reply #58 |
147. "We have seen the negative, sometimes deadly ramifications..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #147 |
160. Indeed--when Amnesty International says this might be a bad thing, it's time to listen. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #160 |
180. And Wikileaks has. You can see the redactions of some names in the current crop of documents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #180 |
230. Questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:53 PM Response to Reply #230 |
241. Actually, the Afghan release did have redactions but Wikileaks is an extremeley small organizatiion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #147 |
179. Still no proof. That is a cautionary letter for what might happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #147 |
188. Backing up a CNN push-poll with a Murdoch Journal opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. Compromises our interests perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
87. I've noticed that "our interests" don't tend to include me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 04:52 AM Response to Reply #87 |
125. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:04 AM Response to Reply #87 |
135. Fucking priceless! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #87 |
164. Totally agree with you...that point needs to be made loud and clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #87 |
252. Great comment, and pithy as it gets. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #51 |
116. So do Sarah Palin, McCain, Peter King, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 02:18 AM Response to Reply #51 |
119. Even the Pentagon has confirmed that, as of the last time they addressed the question, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 03:36 AM Response to Reply #51 |
124. Obama has surpassed Bush in classifying far more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:03 AM Response to Reply #124 |
134. That's quite a claim. Can you cite a reference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:02 AM Response to Reply #51 |
133. Deleted message |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #133 |
145. Sorry you're so close minded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:38 AM Response to Reply #51 |
146. In reality, it is not the leaks, but the war that "Compromises our interests and endangers lives", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:16 PM Response to Reply #51 |
187. Now please point me to a liberal on your list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
larkrake
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
40. I do not believe this- not 1% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
42. You aren't going to make many friends here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Why do you say that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:05 AM Response to Reply #42 |
155. Pretend persecution complex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
44. Looks like push-polling to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
46. Wikileaks was treasonous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Julian is Australian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. To answer a post down-thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. What Amendment gives our government the right to prosecute or attack foreign journalists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #60 |
74. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:28 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. OMG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. Next thing you know, DUers will be advocating for the right of the U.S. to bar us access to the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:10 AM Response to Reply #82 |
138. The logic expressed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:39 PM Response to Reply #77 |
84. It makes no distinction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. True, and thanks for pointing that out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #77 |
91. Deleted message |
Bjorn Against
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #77 |
204. Show me the text of the Constitution that limits freedom of the press to the American press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #77 |
217. And "treason" applies to American citizens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 01:24 AM Response to Reply #77 |
267. Then Australia and or Sweden should be free to prosecute him if he has violated any of their laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:08 AM Response to Reply #60 |
137. Sounds like Scalia reasoning to me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:07 AM Response to Reply #55 |
136. Zactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. You have to be American to commit treason against America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
63. Against whom? He's not a U.S. citizen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #46 |
72. Instant disqualification. Look at a map of the world and figure out which countries are not the USA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:12 AM Response to Reply #72 |
139. But they fall within the empire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
88. Oh noes!!!1111! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
50. Denial is as American as apple pie and strip malls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
53. The crowd is untruth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
54. The fascism is strong in this country, and at DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
56. Even if it were true, it doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katsy
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
62. I don't care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
67. Deleted message |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
68. What were the numbers for ACORN, after the corporate media assault on them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:15 AM Response to Reply #68 |
140. Oh, baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
69. Yes, let's stay stupid and safe in the loving embrace of the US government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. Same... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
75. Glad I am not alone. It has endangered diplomacy and thus made the world even more dangerous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:28 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. And stalled the effort to get the US back diplomatically after 8 horrible years. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Right, by spying on UN members, taking their dna, wiretapping them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:16 AM Response to Reply #78 |
142. "PBS Poll-435" Okay, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #75 |
99. Remember Baader-Meinhof? The "Achille Lauro"? Bologna train station? Rome airport? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 01:55 AM Response to Reply #75 |
118. Who's naive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:16 AM Response to Reply #75 |
141. "Bumblebee" Okay, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
80. I've approved of them from the start. I'm also with this guy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
86. Get back to me when being in the majority makes one right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
89. PUSH POLL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:33 AM Response to Reply #89 |
157. How is it biased? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
94. Liberals and Democrats are apparently terrified of knowing what their governement does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
95. Yes - we are all Reagan Democrats now and we learned to love Big Brother. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qb
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
96. The question omits important details, namely that the documents were carefully redacted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
97. Meh, so what if they don't approve? Do they believe the govt should censor it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
98. Yeah, right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
100. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
101. Most americans are idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
102. Scary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
103. I amazes me how some people would rather be kept in the dark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
104. funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
105. I really don't give a rat's ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
affrayer
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
106. I wonder... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 02:29 AM Response to Reply #106 |
120. Not only that, but the US agents who were trying to warn of 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
107. "self-described liberals" i'm sure.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
108. Percentage of liberals and Democrats who have not been mislead by the mass media smear campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:51 AM Response to Reply #108 |
151. "Some of the information has been removed from the published documents to protect people." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:45 AM Response to Reply #151 |
158. Is that your best defense of CNN's misleading and biased poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 02:06 PM Response to Reply #158 |
177. There is no bias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #177 |
243. It's interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a la izquierda
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
109. i'm a staunch leftist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
111. "WorldNetDaily liberals", I'm guessing. Kind of like "Reagan Democrats". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
112. Yeah.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
113. I call bullshit; it says the South is more pro-wiki than the Midwest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:05 AM Response to Reply #113 |
126. And of course that could not be true.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:21 AM Response to Reply #113 |
144. Plus one. And THAT simply has to be bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinkerbell41
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-10 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
114. Well I'm 40+ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bengalherder
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
121. Let me guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
127. The First Amendment would be defeated in a poll today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrfrapp
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #127 |
211. Depressing indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
129. REAL liberals can't possibly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #129 |
165. If that were true, wouldn't liberals be a numerically irrelevant 6% of this country? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #165 |
182. I could mention something irrelevant. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
143. If they don't actually believe in open govt, they may not have been polling liberals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #143 |
166. If you arbitrarily discard liberals who disapprove of wikileaks, how many liberals in the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
148. Just with reading DU, one could conclude that the politcal junkies at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
149. Thanks for the info nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth_First
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
162. There are a majority of "Democrats" who cannot support Dennis Kucinich either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
168. After looking at their data retrieval method.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
169. So we'll stick our heads into the sand, just pretend that all is grand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #169 |
170. There are things we don't want to know! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
174. Well then, it is a lucky thing that Mr. Assange did not ask for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
176. More media lies, Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
178. WikiLeaks is doomed once people figure out one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #178 |
183. Deleted message |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 06:11 AM Response to Reply #178 |
248. "under certain circumstances." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
184. same % thinks "liberal" means pro-choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
186. Deleted message |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
190. This is 100%, pure, unadulterated, BULLSHIT. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
191. After 9-11 bush had 90% approval ratings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
192. This is what happens when you post/live in an echo chamber |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:46 PM Response to Reply #192 |
195. Which is why you should listen to points of view other than CNN, FOX, etc... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #195 |
197. Your post has absolutely nothing to do with mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #197 |
203. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #203 |
205. No... thank YOU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #195 |
279. Apparently that's not where "liberals hang" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
194. Jimmy crack corn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
199. ..and your point is as this proves what exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
200. I don't believe that poll. This man has done nothing wrong except to shame a few governments that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
201. I'm a bit stunned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 01:16 AM Response to Reply #201 |
275. These numbers are meaningless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
206. Perhaps a better way of phrasing the question would have been this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
207. I remember when W invaded Iraq with an 80% approval rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
208. I have no problem being in the minority on this, if those numbers are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #208 |
296. I do believe a Majority of Liberals are in this Minority grouping with you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
213. I have never, ever, believed that because a majority believes something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueMTexpat
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
216. I am a Democrat and a liberal and I do not disapprove what Wikileaks has done/is doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
218. So, if liberals approved jumping off a cliff 64%-30%, would you jump off a cliff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #218 |
226. Why do you hate President Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
224. Yeah, right. Uh-huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
231. Anyone who believes a poll coming from an MSM source...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
236. Deleted message |
JonLP24
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
238. I must be wrong then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
240. yeah, most of the idiots in this country are woefully under informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThePhilosopher04
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-11 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
242. BULL-FUCKING SHIT!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
245. Telephone polls across a weekend in December . Hmmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanpalmer
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
246. The divide on Wikileaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
253. The denial levels in this thread are off the charts. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #253 |
255. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #253 |
263. You mean, like denial of just how demented this country and its empire has become? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
256. Then most liberals and Democrats are utterly WRONG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
260. A 1984 style poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-11 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
261. Sounds like a huge misundestanding or misprint -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
268. This thread is....interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hyphenate
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
269. I guess I'm in the minority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-11 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
274. Look closely at the results of that poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
277. 286 posts of the truth hurting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
281. That's sad. Any true liberal should be in favor of Wikileaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #281 |
283. "True liberals" should be in favor of damaging their nations security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #283 |
284. Our nation's security is NOT what's at stake here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:57 AM Response to Reply #284 |
285. That's the way you interpret it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #285 |
287. So you accept Guantanomo? Shame on you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #287 |
288. I knew that was coming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #288 |
291. No. I won't try again. You should be very ashamed of your slavish views, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #291 |
292. Which views are unacceptable to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #285 |
289. So much for the "open government" Obama promised us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 11:06 AM Response to Reply #289 |
290. Another promise kept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
286. Studies show that four out of five people disapprove of death. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-11 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
293. Nobody asked me. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
303. Corpofascist flatulence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC