You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #9: Somebody's rich kid must have been mandatorily targeted.
[View All]
jarab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-09-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Somebody's rich kid must have been mandatorily targeted. |
|
They wouldn't change the laws for us common folk, would they?
Judges say change the law so we might protect our own. Just don't set a mandatory maximum.
The discrepanies in sentencing will still exist. Money still rules, and the have-nots will still get their 25 minutes with their court appointed ones.
This doesn't speak all compassion. It's re-establishing power back to the judges' hands.
...O...
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread