You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #1: The thing is he ran on change as you said and also did not take big money.
[View All]
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-18-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The thing is he ran on change as you said and also did not take big money. |
|
So he owes no favors to Monsanto or big agribusiness.
I am still in wait and see mode camp.
He may be playing a craftier game then we can see. Using the fox to go after other foxes ..rather then guard the hen house. Knowing that the fox knows where the other foxes are hiding and what they are up to.
These appointees have to implement his policy ...not their own. Or they will be fired.
When he appoints a republican as he has twice now .. he may just be using them for their influence with other pubs.
Obama has said he will work for us. He is a liberal ..lots here say he is not but just look at his record as a state senator. He is also a constitutional scholar.
Then again.. I may be dreaming. A part of me is very much like you.
But follow your excellent logic... if he is not the change prez he is going to have some explaining to do on all the promises that he breaks.
One more point .. I know where is campaign funds came from.... all of us.
good post for debate k&r
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.