You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Diego Trib: Bush TV ads found more negative [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 11:22 AM
Original message
San Diego Trib: Bush TV ads found more negative
Advertisements [?]
But campaigns keep Calif., other states mostly in dark

By John Marelius
STAFF WRITER

June 13, 2004

(snip)

Since the unofficial start of the general election campaign in early March, President Bush's television advertising campaign has been much more negative than is typical of incumbents, and much more negative than Sen. John Kerry's, the presumptive Democratic nominee.

(snip)

All of this is being conducted on a small playing field. It is being waged almost exclusively in the 18 states that the two campaigns expect will be close in November. That means there is almost no campaigning going on in the rest of the country, including California.


(snip)

The 2004 general election campaign began with 17: Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. Those are states where Bush and Democratic nominee Al Gore were separated by 6 percentage points or fewer in the 2000 election... The Kerry campaign has added to its advertising mix three states that Bush carried by 8 percentage points in 2000: Colorado, Louisiana and Virginia.

(snip)

As of May 20, the Bush and Kerry campaigns had spent $216.9 million, according to figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics. They have already exceeded the $192.2 million spent in the 1992 presidential campaign and are on track to top the 2000 record of $343.1 million. In addition, two independent groups are spending freely on ads opposing Bush. MoveOn.org had spent $14.3 million as of May 30, and the Media Fund, led by former Clinton White House official Harold Ickes, had spent $10.6 million.

(snip)


Benoit's research at Missouri found that as of mid-May, Bush's ads contained 48 percent positive messages and 46 percent attacks. The remaining 6 percent were defenses against attacks. That is an abnormally low positive percentage for an incumbent president, Benoit said, adding that incumbents have averaged 65 percent positive messages in their ads since 1952. Kerry's ads, by contrast, contained 80 percent positive messages. Challengers have averaged 55 percent positive messages in their ads since 1952, Benoit said.


More...

John Marelius: john.marelius@uniontrib.com


Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040613/news_1n13pres.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC