You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Why does Bush get credit for no "terroist attacks in US since 9/11?"
[View All]
keithyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:05 PM
Original message |
| Why does Bush get credit for no "terroist attacks in US since 9/11?" |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 09:05 PM by keithyboy
The first WTC bombing took place under Clinton in 1993. There were no more "terrorist" attacks in the US (unless you count OKC) from 1993 until 9/11/01. The 1993 culprits were apprehended, arrested, and sentenced. I never heard the Republican praising Clinton because there had been no more attacks within the US during his two terms. So what is all this praise about "no more terrorist attacks since 9/11?"
The logic escapeds me and I think I will scream if one more pundit like Woodward makes that statemnet. Do they ever stop to think about what they are saying? You mean to tell me that because the so-called terrorists aren't attacking us 24/7 this is a reason to give Bush credit and to feel that we are safer because of this administration and the Patriot Act? Give me a friggin break!! :grr:
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread