You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #91: Please explain how the mere presence of a firearm endangers people
[View All]
RSillsbee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
91. Please explain how the mere presence of a firearm endangers people |
|
I could go in several directions with this. If you have an ak-47 slung over your shoulder, you are most definitely intimidating other shoppers and putting them in danger.
Being intimidated doe not equal being put in danger. Please explain how the mere presence of a firearm endangers people
So wait, does the mall cop need to wait until the loony/robber/etc is actually pointing the ak-47 at patrons or shopkeepers before he draws his weapon?
Yes, the Mall Cop has to wait until the person carrying the weapon presents a credible threat of violence. Just having a weapon does not meet Colorado's thresh hold. Although there is a law against carrying a long gun w/ a loaded chamber in your vehicle. That law does give any Colorado Peace Officer the legal right to ensure that the long gun does not have a loaded chamber.
It's wrong though, the "citizen" in question was an off-duty police officer who had received mandatory firearms training.
The off duty cop was (obviously) off duty andout of his jurisdiction. He had no police authority. Also most CHP holders have more hand gun training than the police. ( Google frontsite or thunder ranch some time)
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.