You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Yes and the first person who says Vietnam should be sent tomorrow [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes and the first person who says Vietnam should be sent tomorrow
There is a strange logic that has overtaken a lot of thinking people.

Vietnam was an insurgency.

The US ally was overtaken by an insurgency.

The US cannot defeat insurgencies.


Some insurgencies reflect a national liberation movement of a historically distinct people seeking nationhood and independence.


Some insurgencies are evil.


How ironic it is that the People's Republic of Vietnam eventually tires of its neighbor insurgent, the Khmer Republic and invades Cambodia and defeats that evil insurgency.

Thailand defeated an insurgency.

Malaysia defeated an insurgency.

Indonesia defeated an insurgency.

Cambodia was overtaken by an insurgency and then was liberated by a country that was unified by an insurgency.


Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Cambodia all defeated their insurgencies with completely different methodologies. Thailand did it eventually without firing a shot. Malaysia developed a killer method where special forces would track down insurgents even if it took them on month long treks into the jungles. Indonesia used duplicity and Cambodia was liberated of its communist psychotic killers by communists from Vietnam who then handed the country over to the capitalists to take over. (They couldn't stay - they had to repel an invasion from China.)


There is a successful solution. It is an Afghan solution. We can help. We can equip. As you say it may require 60,000 troops initially. It may require 0 troops initially.

In the end it must require 0 NATO troops.

The one thing that is known for sure is that ultimately the Afghans have to do it themselves.


Before people say that we should abandon the Afghans to the Taliban then you should accept that the Taliban will use women as chatel and that they are not a national liberation movement but a movement against the idea of a national government, against the advance of civilization. They have used terror in the past and will use it in the future.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-By4xFJwDYk/SKj45kpqjZI/AAAAAAAAACc/OzCpU2bJrLQ/S1600-R/women+in+burkhas.jpg







And if you don't think that the Taliban doesn't have the same mentality of the Khmer Rouge then go here, but only if you have a very strong stomach.

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/188003.php









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC