You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #56: One example is the fact that
[View All]
zacherystaylor
(97 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
56. One example is the fact that |
|
One example is the fact that a motorcycle cop found something that was clearly blood on his motorcycle who was behind JFK. If the shooter was to the rear the majority of the blood should have gone forward. there might be some legitimate concerns about this but they weren't raised in the trial; instead they questioned his ability to recognize blood which was pretty obvious to any reasonable person. the restrictions they put on his testimony were highly suspicious. It seemed, at times, like they were making it as hard as possible to prove the case; which implies a possible coverup. there were some exceptions; barely enough rulings in the favor of Garrison to give them something to claim fairness.
There is plenty more in the transcripts for you or anyone else who wants to take the time to read them; assuming it is a sincere effort I find it hard to believe that people can't find many problems with this case.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.