You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #13: No. It is not bogus. It did not hurt the effort to get a public option.
[View All]
ray of light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-16-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. No. It is not bogus. It did not hurt the effort to get a public option. |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 05:56 PM by ray of light
There is too much blaming the left when in fact the Republicans and the blue dogs have done everything they could to stop any reform whatsovever!
Tell me...what strong regulations and reforms have the Bluedogs or Republicans presented other than co-ops? What have they done to make sure that there is a meaningful reduction in costs and universal coverage? It is Obama talking about having a place to compare plans and options. The bluedogs and Republicans talk about protecting the insurance companies.
The left is pushing for strong and real reform and not one that allows the insurance agencies to be the sole provider in the market.
I hear a lot of blaming things on the left because they push for the strongest reform of all, single payer or public option, but they also push for strong regulations and they push for competitive choice within the framework we've been given.
I think it's vastly unfair to keep blaming the left wing of the party who basically is asking for the strongest reform that would provide our country with both cost efficiency and universal coverage.
I'm sick to death of the left-wing bashing in this forum.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.