Yesterday, I saw their first article, where they position Brown as less hawkish than Kerry, but the reason they QUOTE as to when Brown would consider a no fly zone is:
Brown, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, didn't rule out the possibility of such a step in the future if the U.S. has "strong and credible information" that Khadafy, for example, is using mercenaries to kill his own citizens.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2011/03/brown_no_rush_o.html?comments=all&plckCurrentPage=0Now there were mercenaries of Gadaffi killed and captured the first week in Benghazi.
The rewritten version (likely the printed version ??) completely removes this - leaving Brown with just cautions on committing American soldiers. They do a better job on Kerry's position.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2011/03/09/scott_brown_urges_caution_on_no_fly_zone_for_libya/