Reply #1: Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!! OMG, that is soooooo Mass-y

[TayTay]

That is one of the funniest article evah!

First we complement the good Senator on how good he looks. Then, not satisfied that he looks good, we question, why do you look so good? (God, in his wisdom, decreed that people age and start to look bad, are you above God's decree?) Since people who are 67 don't just start to look better through better diet or exercise (like that can happen) we decide that he had "work done." Then we seek out experts in the field and ask them about the theoretical work done. 'twas good work, if it was done, which is unproven, but still, very nice work. Then we try to reconcile having theoretical work done with the theoretical nature of having work done as in "the meta of having work done, if you will" and weigh the balance. Then a verdict is arrived at that simultaneously complements the work, questions the "why" of having work done and then declares the whole thing rather unsavory.

And the rubes weigh in and declare it all fake. (And throw in some comments on Barney Frank, who needs work done and is damned if he gets it done. If God had wanted Barney Frank to look good, he wouldn't have made him so smart.)

Wow, what a Mass-hole-y thing to do. It's like a Master's Class in how to be a Mass-soul, from top to bottom. Very funny.
(And we are, sometimes, an indecipherable people up here in the still frozen North, aren't we?)