Reply #5: Oh, it is completely bad, but in the special BH way

[TayTay]

They can't just say they disapprove. They can't. You can't tell other people what to do or not do because that would be too direct. So, the writing has to be done very specifically. First the theoretical issue is raised. It is specifically raised as a theoretical. What if John Kerry had work done? Well, of course he can have it done if he wants to. (Of course he can and people from all walks of life and backgrounds and professions do have minor things done.) However, there is a moral undertone of disapproval here that is just sooooo Mass-y. (BH-- you snide bunch of bastards. This is writing that wants to "have it's cake and eat it too." Half the people who read the BH have had work done, remember that. How does the BH insult JK without insulting these folks?)

Then, the newspaper of the common man does what any good Mass-soul would do in this predicament, it consults experts in the field. (Come on, this trait in Mass is hilarious. BH -- which prides itself on being the voice of the common man has to go to experts to debate a theoretical event and gain legitimacy therein. Oh please, how funny is that?)

This whole article is pure BH idiocy. Top to bottom. I find it funny.