Reply #5: Actually, it was not.

[Mass]

(at least not in the literal sense given by David)

The full video is on line (and listed in the comments) and it is clear that the people in the comments talking about access by I 91 and I 90 are the ones who are correct. The comment is in the last 30 secs of the video.

Actually, I laughed when I read the post. Sometimes, we become stupid justifying what our candidates say (talking about BMG here). But I do not know anybody in the area that thinks that a city along the Connecticut River is not landlocked in the literal sense of the term. This is why I was asking for the context, as the literal meaning was extremely weird.