Reply #40: Good point. Furthermore, The First Amendment does not say that her opinion/conclusions must be

[file83]

provable in a court of law. She's analyzing information and coming to her own conclusions - These aren't completely unsubstantiated accusations. It's not like she accused CACI of being involved in a child porn ring or anything.

For example, even though Ken Lay was never found "guilty" of involvment in the Enron scandle (he died before too soon), why didn't his family sue every single radio talk show over the years that implied that he was responsible for Enron's collapse?