You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary? Obama? Nillary? Nobama? Either? Neither? Read this post! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:44 PM
Original message
Hillary? Obama? Nillary? Nobama? Either? Neither? Read this post!
Advertisements [?]

The Death of "If"

It wasn't that long ago that candidates for high political office listed the miraculous feats
they would try to accomplish, if they were elected to the office they were seeking.

"If" was a good word back then.

Somewhere along the line, some PR guy or powerful pollster must have come out with the theory that "if"
is too tentative, not persuasive enough. The voters must not be given the option of thinking that the candidate's
NOT being elected is even a possibility. And that's when the word "if" was deleted from the Candidates' Thesaurus and
replaced with the more forceful and forward-thinking "when."

So we are given the spectacle of 7 or 8 intelligent adults standing on a platform, each grasping the sides of their podium
with white knuckles and speaking into the microphone in as confident a voice as they can muster, saying "WHEN I am inaugurated in January 2008."
and "WHEN I am President of the United States," and "When my administration is in power..."

Is there a reality-deficit going on? Surely they must realize, as they all insist on "when" instead of "if,' that it will not be possible for all of them
to actually be elected President of the United States. I mean, it only makes sense, right? Which means that, as they stand there in their nicely pressed
clothes and hair-sprayed do's, all but one of them is lying, right to our face. LYING, because not ALL of them will be inaugurated.

I submit that candidates should look back to the time when being elected to public office was considered an honor invested by the people
in the candidate. It was something they sought to achieve, through our good graces. And, only IF they earned our respect and trust and
our vote would they then have the right to say, "When I am the next President of the United States..."

If only that kind of humility still existed, perhaps the public servants would actually try to serve the public once in a while. I will keep this
thought in mind when I cast my vote, if next November comes.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC