You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: I'm saying that the total of the areas under the line is vastly larger than-- [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm saying that the total of the areas under the line is vastly larger than--
--total of the areas above the line.

That means we have an ongoing disaster that no one in DC (with very few exceptions) gives a bloody goddam about. What we are on track for is the only 20 year period in our history with ZERO NET JOB GROWTH! The bikini chart does NOT take into account growth of the labor force, which averages 125K-150K/month. That means that the panglossian drooling over 140K jobs ignores the fact that there was very, very little net job gain is highly inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC