You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: And since you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And since you
brought up the mortgage settlement, the sources of the current sleight of hand are fairly obvious.


NYT

<...>

Kathryn S. Wylde, the president of the Partnership for New York City, a network of business leaders, said that Mr. Cuomo was “appropriately changing the terms of debate from the class warfare language of the millionaires’ tax advocates to focus on tax reform that promotes universal fairness.”

He knows it is possible to raise revenues without inflammatory rhetoric that drives business and wealth out of the state,” Ms. Wylde said. She added that because lawmakers had moved this year “in the direction of showing they could exercise some discipline over spending,” the business community would support a “balanced approach” of spending cuts and new revenues as Mr. Cuomo drew up his next budget.

<...>


The Millionaire’s Tax

<...>

Governor Andrew Cuomo opposes the extension of the millionaire’s tax, actually a tax on individuals who make at least $200,000 and families that make at least $300,000. He thinks it would place New York at a competitive disadvantage with its neighbors.

I respect the governor, but that’s a canard. As Robert Frank explained last February in The Wall Street Journal, the number of millionaires in New York actually increased in 2010 (when the tax was in place): “New York had 381,197 millionaires in 2010, an increase of 35,000 millionaires from 2009.”

In that same article, Mr. Frank quoted Kathryn Wylde, the president of the Partnership for New York City (which opposed the tax extension), as saying that even if the numbers don’t support the theory that rich people are flocking to other states, there is some anecdotal evidence that they are. “Our evidence is from conversations with lots of high earners and there is an increasing tendency to gravitate to lower-tax places,” she said.

If it’s anecdotal evidence the Partnership wants, here’s what Mayor Michael Bloomberg, also known as the richest man in New York City, said in 2008: “I can only tell you, among my friends, I’ve never heard one person say ‘I’m going to move out of the city because of taxes.’ Not one. Not in all the years I’ve lived here.” (Despite this astute observation, Mr. Bloomberg opposes the tax.)

<...>

Remember that name? That was the person who was alleged to be an Obama ally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC