You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #7: Why would it have to go that far?
[View All]
ohnoyoudidnt
(250 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-27-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Why would it have to go that far? |
|
Couldn't it be challenged as soon as it is passed without someone being charged first?
The Supreme Court just backed Arizona's immigration law without there being a criminal case.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.