You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #6: No, no, no, that's dog-on-man. Santorum approves of that since . . .
[View All]
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
6. No, no, no, that's dog-on-man. Santorum approves of that since . . . |
|
that's how thing's need to end up, in order to feed the dogs of UN-ENDING WAR that will destroy the human race and damage this planet in nuclear war for American Exceptionalism.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.