You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: It's arrogant but he might have a case. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's arrogant but he might have a case.
He's arguing the New York Fed did not insist on haircuts for the financial instruments AIG sold to Goldman and the big financial institutions. The result was a much bigger bailout and larger loss of equity in the company for Greenberg (nevermind AIG would not exist at absent intervention).

This is what can happen when you allow the conflict of interest at the New York fed to continue. Bankers can bail themselves out with public equity and leave taxpayers on the hook for liabilities with no say from congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC