Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Extraordinary Measures (9-11 Comm Why did Woodward see PDB's?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:38 AM
Original message
Extraordinary Measures (9-11 Comm Why did Woodward see PDB's?)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4304339/

Faced with presidential resistance to turning over highly sensitive intelligence briefs, the commission investigating the September 11 terror attacks tried to learn the details in the documents by obtaining access to White House transcripts of interviews that senior officials gave to a prominent journalist, NEWSWEEK has learned.

The extraordinary access that top Bush administration officials gave Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward more than two years ago for his book, “Bush at War,” became a principle issue in the contentious battle between the September 11 panel and the White House over access to the President’s Daily Briefs or PDBs—the intelligence briefing report that is given to the president every morning.

Threatened with a subpoena for the documents, the White House relented somewhat last week and agreed to allow the full ten member commission to hear a summary of key PDBs about the Al Qaeda terrorist threat that were given to Bush and before him, to President Clinton. The summary was prepared by a four-member team that was allowed to read under highly restrictive conditions hundreds of PDBs dating back to 1998.

Still, the last-minute deal, sources tell NEWSWEEK, came only after intense negotiations in which members of the federal panel repeatedly brought up the Woodward interviews as evidence of the administration’s hypocritical approach toward secrecy. How, commission officials demanded to know, could the White House deny a federal panel investigating the worst crime in U.S. history access to documents that it had already shared with a journalist?
“Woodward was a point of reference to show the PDBs were not as sacrosanct as they claimed,” said one commission official familiar with the negotiations with the White House. “In his book, Woodward claims he saw the PDBs. That was an argument that these were not the ‘Holy of Holies.’”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Heres a thought
KRISTEN BREITWEISER: http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/911widows.html
There's always this level of anxiety because
nothing is finite. Nothing is finished.
Nothing is complete. Nothing is solid.
And I think that that has an emotional impact,
because really on the morning of September 11th,
we all became untethered from the Earth.
And we just want a grounding.
________________________________________________________________

Was raining in my heart
Falling deep inside of me
Drowning in my soul
This silence rushes over me
I am breath against this fire
And I will not turn away
I'm waiting for time to carry me
Like a tempest to the sea
Standing strong
Watching over
Love will keep me believing
Thru the dark...can you hear me calling
Holding on when I'm dreaming
Love is all...Love is all
Thundering on high
Love was all I knew before I fell
And now the shots of man
Are echoing inside myself
I am breath against this fire
And I will not turn away
I'm waiting for time to carry me
Like a tempset to the sea
Standing strong
Watching over

Yanni - Love Is All.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why did Woodward see PDBs?
Because he was being used as part of the WH PR campaign to promote bush* as a "wartime" pResident. Why isn't the 9/11 commission given the same access? Because apparently they are NOT interested in promoting the WH talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Do a Google search on Bob Woodward...you may be amazed to...
...learn about his background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. They probably showed Woodward very little.
And had him agree to spin what they did show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And now they are caught in a trap
of their own making. (again)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. The more they try to hide them
the more I'm sure they had warnings about 9/11.

Woodward never should have seen the PDB's under any circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The stonewalling itself is proof that LIHOP was indeed the plan...
Their resistance to cooperating w/ the panel (especially during an election year) at the very least indicates they are hiding something so devastating, so despicable that admitting it would surely sink them in November. And I doubt they're hiding mere incompetence (because they could say they were only in office for 9 months, not enough time to stop the terrorists, blah blah blah). That leaves LIHOP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 05th 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC