|
a wedge issue... ok, sharpen your quills and lets make this a CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE, which is exactly what it is.
If you choose to use as example... here is the letter I just fired out to my delegation
Now if enough critters get this, they will realize that this is not an issue they want to go with... but it will show the country exactly where Bush is... against Civil Rights... so it is time we take their issues and reframe them in ways that most Americans understand them... and yes jobs et al are critical, so are civil rights wiht the chimpy junta.
*******************************
Dear Madman: Well, red meat issues are being used to keep the base excited... AKA Bush in favor of a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Maybe, while the President (and the Christian Right) are at it, they should beg for the return of Plessy Vs Ferguson, I am sure a Constitutional Amendment is also in order. Maybe we should also ban all inter racial marriages. Maybe, we should forget that this country has a theoretical separation of Church and State. Now lets be plain. If any religious leader decides that the tenets of his or her faith prevent him or her from carrying out a marriage, that is a religious decision, and the State cannot, indeed should not force him or her to carry out that RELIGIOUS ceremony. But we are not talking here about a Religious Decision but a policy decision within a SECULAR State. In that sense, the rights of marriage, AKA that marriage license, accrues benefits and obligations to the state, not to the Church. Never should we forget there are differences. In many ways marriage, yes the dreaded word, in city hall before a representative of the State is a policy decision and it affects things such as visitation rights, inheritance rights and civil rights. It has nothing to do with whether that couple is living in sin or not. This is not the decision of the state ... and this is not the purview of the state. As John Locke once wrote, the state's obligations should be limited to keeping tranquility, the raising of taxes and services to the people. The Church has no role in telling me how to live my civil life. It has a role on how to live my religious life. But those two should never be confused ... and right now we are in danger of the Church, in particular the Religious Right, telling the state what to do. Now I will also make another point ... this problem truly started with the Defense of Marriage Act ... which is a RELIGIOUS DECISION, as marriage is defined in the act in religious terms. I have also to say, that the DOMA is a mistake, not unlike Separate but Equal of Plessy Vs Ferguson, but it seems some folks insist on taking the country back to 1900, or worst, some of our Religious leaders are like any religious zealot across history, wanting to impose their believes on the whole society ... not unlike the Taliban. I may remind you, when those six kids went to Central High in Arkansas, that required the Screaming Eagles and the US Marshals to protect them. It was that unpopular and those kids would have been lynched otherwise. The arguments that were made back then against getting rid of Plessy Vs Ferguson, (Separate but Equal) were very similar to the arguments made today about Gay Civil Rights. Yes, Ma'am, this is not about sin, or lack of, but purely civil rights and the expansion of such to a group of citizens who have them denied right now. And if we were to go by polls, Plessy Vs Ferguson would still be in the books, and I would have never been able to marry my husband, as I happen to be Jewish and before he converted he was Catholic, in the 1950s that was frowned upon, and was down right illegal in some states. It is time to throw all pretenses and clearly state, that in a SECULAR State, a small group of religious fanatics has no role in determining Secular policy. Otherwise, the dream of this Republic may be in peril, as slowly the principles under which she was founded are being chipped away, and this is no coincidence either. Sincerely, *********** *************
|