|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:27 AM Original message |
Parker Griffith Staff Resigns: Nearly Every Member Quits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. Purists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
35. ROFL!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
43. That they be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 05:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
62. I guess they each had a decision to make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 03:43 AM Response to Reply #62 |
99. considering they lost a job by choosing, good for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 09:53 AM Response to Reply #99 |
113. It certainly took some guts, especially in these economic times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:19 AM Response to Reply #62 |
102. That's what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scentopine
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
74. LOL - thanks for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
83. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. He'd have run the party. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larry Ogg
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:22 AM Response to Reply #83 |
103. I have a dream... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe Sharon Wheeler would like to run on the Democratic ticket? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratefultobelib
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good for them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BolivarianHero
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Real Democrats don't ban sex toys either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BolivarianHero
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Why thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
44. Those 'toys' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. seems to be the most plausible explanation in circumstances such as these. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
55. "Talibama" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
84. Most Southern Democrats.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larry Ogg
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
110. I think you meant to say that real dems don't knowingly campaign for repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. People with principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldstein1984
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. Liberal Integrity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good to see they have basic loyalty to the Democratic Party.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. +1000000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
perdita9
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. The Strength of their Convictions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
76. They do seem to have what counts, principles. ... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Turncoat FAIL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomg
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. That is integrity. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newtothegame
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. No news here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. Awesome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. He always seemed greasy to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. Weren't they conservatives to begin with? How did that help America? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheEuclideanOne
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. i am going to guess they were not as conservative and picked the less corrupt of the parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Why didn't they pick a liberal pol to work for then if they weren't conservative? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. no, i am sure they are more conservative than say a North eastern democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. The only difference between a conservative Dem and a conservative Repub is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. I am a conservative Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. The repugs have become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Sherman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
V_Byl
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
56. Agreed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobTheSubgenius
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
86. “Politics is the entertainment branch of industry.” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. So true, but they need better acts! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:39 AM Response to Reply #92 |
109. Great retort to a great quote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:32 AM Response to Reply #86 |
106. Great quote. Sad, but great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #41 |
58. So true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 06:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
69. curious - if you don't mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. I think he is right on some issues and don't agree with him on others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
79. Let me butt in, ... if republicans were like Ron Paul, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:25 AM Response to Reply #79 |
104. true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:36 AM Response to Reply #69 |
108. Do you mean a " pay go" liberal? Or are you simply for higher taxes and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #108 |
116. Perhaps it is a slur, but I mean it in the 1984 DNC Mario Cuomo way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
91. I think you're right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #41 |
105. Good point, which may be why people have begun to use terms like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #105 |
118. Precisely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
71. Did you miss the part where they were from Alabama? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:45 PM Response to Reply #71 |
93. Has Alabama seceded? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 02:33 AM Response to Reply #23 |
97. Politicians who don't get elected don't have too many people working for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
101. Apparently, they consider themselves "conservative Democrats." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
59. Congressional staffers' political views are not reflective the people they work for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:46 PM Response to Reply #59 |
94. I understand now. Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Owl
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
16. Loyalty... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
17. Americans acting like Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. Hooray for them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. NICE!! Some Good News Today, Where Usually It's Just Another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
21. "...but Brutus is an honorable man." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. Instead of "quit" say "pulled a Sarah Palin." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
51. RedCloud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
27. Good for them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
28. Parker Griffith Can't Lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #28 |
52. Current predictions are that the AL-05 R primary could be boatloads of fun for Ds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueworld
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
31. Kudos! Bravo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flatulo
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. What about Arlen Specter? He switched from R to D. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #49 |
85. Or Jim Jeffords. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
32. How's that workin' out for ya so far, Parker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
33. I wish we would see more principled people on both sides of the isle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beltanefauve
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Eliot Richardson n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #33 |
111. Not only AG Eliot Richardon, but also Archibald Cox (special prosecutor), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
37. Good for them! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
38. Maybe They Got a Better Offer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
39. Someone needs to get everyone of them a job. They need to land somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
42. Translation: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
46. 50 Richest Members of Congress (CQ 2009) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 10:05 AM Response to Reply #46 |
115. They must be combining spouse's weath or Kerry and McCain probably would not have made the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
47. Can We Have Our $1,076,370 Back? (OpenLeft Aug 2009) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 06:35 PM Response to Reply #47 |
70. I hope his campaign is stripped down to pencils, legal pads, and tin cans with string. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
48. AL-05: Parker Griffith Can Lose (Daily Kos) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. get teabagged to death? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mstinamotorcity
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
60. the twain did not meet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #60 |
81. Good post your are probably correct, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dcsmart
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
61. proud of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
63. Keepin it real. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
64. He'll be picked off by a teabagger in the primary and then maybe another Dem will win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penndragon69
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
65. Great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
66. Work for a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecklyTyler
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
67. Form letter from Parker Griffith to staff: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarthDem
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
68. Awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
72. Kudo's to the staff... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
73. "great Democratic conservative leadership?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
75. But, ... it really does just go to show ya, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mendocino
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
77. Once he went to the dark side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. If you are from Mendocino, you should send them your hemp paper, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
82. He's gonna be out of office by 2011 anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
88. You deserve what you get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
89. Whoooohooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
90. Now, he's going to hire his cousin Peter from Quahog, Rhode Island, as chief of staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earcandle
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
95. Go Dems! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loudmxr
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
96. Years ago I was trick or treating with my goddaughter in the neighborhood.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 03:15 AM Response to Original message |
98. It's still the 19th century in Alabama's fifth district? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #98 |
112. You seem to have misunderstood that sentence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #112 |
117. But I thought that the Democratic party was conservative pre-Great Depression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 06:48 AM Response to Original message |
100. I wonder if Legislative Director Megan Swearingen is a descendant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
107. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
114. The article names those who left. I wish it had also named those who stayed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon May 12th 2025, 03:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC