|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Gothmog
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:28 PM Original message |
Newsweek-Justice Department bracing for Supreme Court defeat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Thank heaven for small favors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. What makes you think they wouldn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
priller
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. This is great news -- finally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. It'll be a 6-3 decision with Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas dissenting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
39. Those 3 are Criminals in Robes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's high time to ask for Ashcroft's resignation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wow, if this is correct, it will have enormous ramifications on the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. It also means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. The Constitution of the USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. What did they expect? The law's the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gothmog
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. I was pleased when I saw this article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teryang
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. Time for SCOTUS to rejoin the mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zydeco
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
13. We really do need to demonstrate to the Iraqi's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. We could use a little of that demonstration to the home folks too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. I swear to God, if the SCOTUS didn't rule against the inJustice Dept.,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
15. BUT...How does Newsweek KNOW the SCOTUS is voting AGAINST???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. More to the point, how does the Justice Department know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 10:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Gee,...I just friggin' wonder HOW the Justice Dept. could know!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. (as they line their pockets) "This was only for the good of the nation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
17. CBS says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. Will the wacko RW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Yeah... the strict constructionists with fealty to the Constitution ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Do you remember the days when.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Yup. I once voted Republican as much as Democratic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
19. It'll be 6-3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
20. It will be either 6-3 or 7-2! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. I hope this is true. But with this wingnut court, I'm not sure. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
22. Great news! If so, a constitutional chink in this admin's lawlessness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. If SCOTUS rules against Bush (sounds odd... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedda_foil
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. Congress can't deny the Court the right to rule on any law they make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. isn't it funny how "ideological" and "idiotic" seem to go hand-in-hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
28. good news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markses
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. Any ruling in favor of the "enemy combatant" category for US citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
38. I really like how you articulated the basic concept of our freedoms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 12:57 AM Response to Reply #29 |
42. excellent post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dArKeR
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
32. Feds Exaggerated Padilla Case? - CBS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
33. Oh THANK REAGAN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
34. It's a no brainer (or it should be) |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
40. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
41. The Supremes doing the right thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Feb 13th 2025, 04:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC