Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tarnishing a Glittering Record - WSJ's Al Hunt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:31 AM
Original message
Tarnishing a Glittering Record - WSJ's Al Hunt
Ralph Nader is absolutely right: It's offensive to suggest he's not entitled to run for president. Of course he is.

So was Harold Stassen. Likewise, former heavyweight boxing champion Larry Holmes had every right to come out of retirement and fight the likes of Butterbean. But in pursuing such quixotic quests, Messrs. Stassen and Holmes tarnished their reputation and legacy. That's also what Mr. Nader, in his egocentric repeat run for the presidency, is doing.

(snip)

The greatest risk for Mr. Nader is not losing, a foregone conclusion, or even throwing an election to George W. Bush, as onerous as that is to those who've worked with him over the years. It is to blemish his extraordinary achievements over 40 years. Millions of Americans are alive because of the Nader-spawned auto safety movement. If I don't wear a seat belt my teenage kids yell at me; they'd laugh if I told them that not too long ago the anti-Naderites considered mandatory seat belts an insidious intrusion by the federal government.

(snip)

He also has spawned several generations of public-interest advocates. There are college kids graduating this year whose parents were children when he took on General Motors -- the classic David vs. Goliath battle with the same ending -- who, whether they know it or not, are Nader disciples.

(snip)

Four years ago, the Nader candidacy had a coherent rationale: the Clinton-Gore administration disappointed the left and had cozy relations with business interests. Mr. Nader contended there was no real difference between Al Gore and George W. Bush.

That's a claim even he doesn't make today. He suggests he's a more perfect choice, if not a viable one.

(snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who does Al Hunt want to win the Presidency in 2004? (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's believes Kerry will win. Hunt is a good Dem. n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 25th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC