I'm in another email debate with some friends. They consider themselves republicans, though I don't know that they truly understand why. Anyway, I sent them to the
http://www.presidentmatch.com and low and behold their candidate was *.
But I believe there's a disconnect between * and true conservatives, and began trying to figure out what makes a conservative. Here is my initial thought and response:
Look, I don't have a problem with conservative issues - I happen to agree with many of them. What I do have a problem with is the people in this administration claiming to be conservative when they are clearly aren't.
True conservatives are fiscally responsible and do not believe in imperialistic foreign policy. True conservatives stand by the separation of church and state. True conservatives do not support invasion of privacy, nor do they accept that civil rights must be sacrificed in the name of security. True conservatives believe in smaller government.
Yet when you look at the last three years, Bush can claim NONE of these things. The deficit and national debt are out of control (congratulations, we just surpassed 7 TRILLION in debt with no end in sight). We have invaded a country that clearly WAS NOT a threat to the United States, and was barely a threat to its neighbors. Today we are witnessing an assault on church-state separation, which would be humorous if it weren't so troubling, since this is the very thing "we" decry in Islamic countries. The Patriot Act ignores the Constitution, and would not have prevented 9/11. The necessary tools were already in place, and if somebody in the administration had been paying attention (rather than ignoring things for the first 9 months), perhaps 9/11 could have been prevented. And finally, government is actually LARGER now than it was at the end of the Clinton administration.
Am I off-base on this? I probably left out something on the environment, but what else is missing/incorrect?