Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good JFK assasination website??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tammuz Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:03 PM
Original message
Good JFK assasination website??
I know someone who seems to think that JFK was not a conspiracy,

He references this website:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

as proof,

Are there any good JFK websites that put all the outrageously suspicious facts together on one page?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. www.jfkresearch.com
But it is a pay site, you can get a 30 day trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. McAdams is known as a long-time shill for the U. S. government and...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Note the position of the bullet hole in the back.
That is the position the Warren Commission states the "Magic Bullet" entered, moved up through bone and muscle, emerged through the President's throat, exited so cleanly the wound was identified by ER doctors as actually an "entrance wound," turned right, entered John Connally's back, exited his chest, entered his wrist, leaving a good chunk of shrapnel, exited his wrist and lodged in his thigh, from where it fell onto a hospital gurney he never used, looking like this:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. McAdams is a turd of the BFEE.
This site explains why:

http://www.geocities.com/justicewell/faq.htm

This site has a lot of info, for those who want to go over the facts for themselves:

http://www.jfklancer.com/

For those new to the subject, here's an interesting point to consider:

"Where was the Secret Service protection?



The picture was taken in Dallas on November 22, 1963.
Note the exposed position of the President and his party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. A word of warning concerning JFK sites...
While most are pretty good, the story has become so convoluted, it is like looking for a dime, after diving in a pool full of spaghetti.

W/o going many a detailed account, there are many out there that will take some 'facts' and twist them for their own ends. This works for both sides.

I believe that there was a conspiracy in the assassination of JFK, there is simply too much hard evidence to go against it. It is the circumstantial evidence that creates all of the theories, and hence the debunking of those theories.

the links above are great, and there are many others that have been down this road before. Therefore, you request for a 'one page' synopsis of events, is by design, virtually impossible, (unless you accept that Oswald shot JFK and was alone).

Good luck. There are two things I know in my mind that are true;

1. Oswald did not shoot JFK.

2. Ruby shot Oswald.

Who, what, when, and how remain a mystery.

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. amen, bra
one other thing of which you can be CERTAIN

a court of law determined (by jury) that EH Hunt had NO case for libel against that little newspaper which asserted that Hunt was conspirator in the assassination

jurors interviewed afterwards thought it was obvious that Hunt was involved

that all happened, too

what it proves can is up to the news consumer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tammuz Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. nice document
Edited on Sat Feb-21-04 07:01 PM by Tammuz
Thanks for your help everyone!



Heres a nice document from the Texas archives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. could you enlarge it a bit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks, I forgot all about that one...
there are several other cases that were brought, but they went nowhere. Bottom line, this was covered up and obfuscated to such an extent, that getting down to brass tacks is ludicrous.

I also find it interesting, although at this time inconclusive, the fact that so many who had an "interest" in the case died in many a "mysterious way". The odds are ridiculously against all of these people committing suicide, and meeting violent deaths. the possibility exists though, so we can not be conclusive in our own minds that these things didn't happen as stated.

Another feeding frenzy is in the making, and more lies will pour out. Somewhere in there, is the Truth. It will take a lifetime to get to that Truth.

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2024, 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC