|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:02 PM Original message |
So the Justice Department can withhold information from Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Checks and balances, you traitor! This is War! Remember 9/11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. They can if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackstraw45
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not with a rubberstamp congress.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. No. The Justice Department can NOT withhold information from Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. It will be interesting to see if bush claims executive priviledge... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Kennedy is nailing him on the Executive Priviledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. The checks and balances are supposed to be Congress and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. In a fascist system of government, there is only one effective branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Constitutional Crisis!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Reminds me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senior citizen
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
11. The Justice Department believes that withholding information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Biden just told Ashcroft he's not allowed to NOT answer the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'm watching the re run also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Vote in an additional 1/2 party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Duty Under Oath! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus
![]() |
Tue Jun-08-04 10:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I hear that! Geez, did you see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Feb 19th 2025, 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC