|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Poiuyt
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:13 PM Original message |
My one complaint about F911 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. You didn' tmiss it, 'cuz it wasn't there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Insider
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. that's ironic, i guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still_Loves_John
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think that if he put in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think he's auspiciously trying to avoid the Conspiracy Theorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Yes, Sometimes It's Better To Let People Put 2 And 2 Together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. what about the stuff about the pipeline? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adadem
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. I was also disappointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yes! Michael Moore at the Oscars again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. No Mention of PNAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. By avoiding PNAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrustingDog
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. too much ground to cover.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Maybe we need F911, part 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWizardOfMudd
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. MM should have at least -mentioned- it, I agree, but that's a whole nother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Deleted message |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
15. I think without absolute *proof* he'd have been treading on dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funkybutt
![]() |
Fri Jun-25-04 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. i agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Feb 17th 2025, 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC