|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:22 AM Original message |
Why didn't the Senate support the CBC objections over coup 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. The movie did not present Congres in a very good light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Beyond sad. Pisses me off to no end that no folks on the Hill from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cthrumatrix
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. sadly agree..and makes one wonder if TPTB had this as the plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
3. What about Carol Mosley Braun? She may have lost her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Me too? Though it sounds as if it would have been futile anyhow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. True. Maybe they thoought they were helping Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Hindsight is 20/20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. There was some "legal discussion" on the topic at the time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Post #7 points out that the house was controlled by the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. awsome w13rd0... Can one appease traitors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catzies
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
98. I came away from the movie angry with incumbents (even some good ones) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Carol Moseley Braun lost the 1998 election, not 2000. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
34. Ah thank you for pointing that out. I thought it was 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Moseley-Braun lost in 1998. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
46. Good point.( on edit: I see she may have not been in Senate) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
56. Moseley-Braun was US Ambassador |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I Lean Left
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
60. Braun was gone by then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedda_foil
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
84. Carol lost her Senate seat in '98. She wasn't there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
7. Because it was really up to Gore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I disagree with the first part of your analysis as I've read indepth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Good article, mzmolly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. No problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. You need to read Too Clost to Call, by Jeffrey Toobin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:19 AM Response to Reply #19 |
30. You need to read "Blaming Al Gore-The Latest Crime of the Stolen Election" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Gore didn't to the supreme court, bush did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Ches, it sounds like it would have been futile anyhow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. Gore was told by experts to skip the contest phase and go straignt to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. There is different analysis here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:19 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Toobin's analysis goes into much more depth. You should read the book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:26 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. The article I posted was in response to the book.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. It's not a thorough rebuttal. Toobin's a lawyer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. The article I posted addresses this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. This is not a rebutttal of Toobins arguments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Al Gore wanted to win as badly as we wanted him too. I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:12 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Understanding what happened in 2000 can only help you understand what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Understanding one mans view is not going to change my opinion of Al Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:50 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. It's not just one man's view. It's a well-researched, in depth analysis of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. No matter how much he researches the matter he is one man with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:22 PM Response to Reply #66 |
93. There's a lot to be said for a well-researched opinon though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
43. dup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nay
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
36. "Why would a Dem senator stick his neck out for a guy who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:45 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Sure they have. Because the measure would have sent the decison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
94. Would that senator want to be known as the person who cost the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfxgillis
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
15. It would have delayed the count by a few hours or a day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaPat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
16. This is how dictators take over. You do something for the "right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:06 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. I think the fact that our media is so brain dead/docile/compacient in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nay
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:45 AM Response to Reply #16 |
41. Thank you, FloridaPat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
54. Nicely put...and in ever so much more politer terms than I can manage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #54 |
64. well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freeforall
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
20. I was absolutely appalled to see that not one lousy senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
21. it would have caused more coverage of the disenfranchisement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I agree, I think that's about all it would have achieved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. I think it's important to delegitmize Bush. He is a fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. And we have the media to thank for a lack of awareness as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. It would have cost senators parity on the committees and Republicans would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nay
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:53 AM Response to Reply #28 |
44. **newsflash** AP, the Repubs are ramming everything through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:09 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. We're talking from 2000-2002. Now they have a majority in both houses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lucky777
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
24. This caught my eye again during the movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushwakker
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. I bought Jeff Toobin's book abouth theft 2000 Too Close To Call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
37. No support from Kerry either, very disappointing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:44 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Turns out we were in a lose/lose situation.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:57 PM Response to Reply #39 |
89. Mine's getting a bit bigger each day, I'll share mzmolly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:19 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. LMAO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senior citizen
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
47. My best guess is that the DNC and the DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. "had been even one senator to sign the CBC petition, we would have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
53. GORE TOOK THE BAIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:48 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Yup ... Dems are suckers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Not as much as Nader voters are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:08 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. we will disagree on this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. "Nader haters" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:40 PM Response to Reply #67 |
87. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:28 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Check his Senate record .. it means much more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:28 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. We shall see won't we. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:32 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. I hope we do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. You mean "smear" as in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:47 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Not to mention the fool is running AGAIN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:55 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. I voted for Nader in 96 and 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #73 |
86. Not arguing but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:27 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Yes we do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. sound bite it for me, molly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. Ask Moore what he'd like to see happen because of his movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Not too shabby, Molly : - ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. Thanks mdmc.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:07 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. Smartest thing Nader has said in the last 4 to 5 years. He'd look like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
63. Gore asked Senators not to contest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
72. Gore acted with honor, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. Of course it wasn't Pro-Democrat. Moore is not a Democrat, but he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Peace , Molly..., Thanks for the back and forth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #63 |
88. Actually, as I recall, MM implied how difficult it must have been for Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moonbeam_Starlight
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
68. I don't want to excuse a lack of Senate support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Indeed, to question the CBC we must also question everyone who was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. well, has the CBC lost credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Gore spoke the truth. He wasn't trying to be humorous. Did you see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
85. BECAUSE AL GORE ASKED THEM NOT TO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:38 PM Response to Reply #85 |
91. Hmmmm. I'd be interested in learning more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vadem
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
99. I have the tape of January 6, 2001, of the certifying of electors.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vadem
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
100. II have the tape of January 6, 2001, of the certifying of electors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vadem
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:40 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Sorry for the dupes! I was trying to correct typos in the message .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vadem
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
102. :kick: this is important! :kick: eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 09:51 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kenneth ken
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
104. Thanks all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Feb 07th 2025, 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC